Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes:
> Hi all, I'm trying to make a python clone in guile. Currently the code is
> slow and one of the reasons is the following,
>
> in my pythoon
>
> return 1,2
>
> returns a (values 1 2) in order to get python and scheme to interoperate. but
> for python if you use
Hello dear Guilers and Guixers,
I wholeheartedly agree with everything positive that has been said about
Guile and Guix. Both are amazing projects led by amazing people, and
probably some of the most important components of GNU's future. I've
been on a long hiatus due to political interests othe
On 20.10.2019 05:08, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Taylan Kammer writes:
>> I'm mostly fond of the Contributor Covenant that was adopted by Guix
>
> I suggest that we postpone discussion of this proposal for now. It
> might create more divisions between us, at a time when we
On 03.01.2020 19:30, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> Should the #:re-export clause propagate the replace bit, or should
> it not? :-)
The 2.9.8 release notes say one should use #:re-export-and-replace for
this use-case.
Happy new year!
Taylan
During the R7RS-small discussion, I remember Will Clinger suggesting to
keep (eqv? proc1 proc2) => #t but unspecifying it for eq?. Would that
help in Guile's case? I don't remember the exact optimization he
suggested this for.
- Taylan
On 14.01.2020 17:47, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> It might be
Many thanks to everyone for this amazing release. :-)
> ** Add support for R7RS
Given the now official R7RS support, let me remind people of this repo:
https://github.com/TaylanUB/scheme-srfis/
Development is inactive, but patches, merge requests, or forks/takeovers
are welcome.
I think th
> (defmacro define-session (name value)
> (define (inner n v)
> (set! decl
> (cons
> (make-var n v)
> decl))
> )
> `(,inner ',name ,value))
The problem here is that the macro output
`(,inner ',name ,value)
would include a # object, because it evaluates 'in
(Duplicate of the mail I sent to guile-devel before realizing you're not
on the list.)
> (defmacro define-session (name value)
> (define (inner n v)
> (set! decl
> (cons
> (make-var n v)
> decl))
> )
> `(,inner ',name ,value))
The problem here is that the mac
I think the following discrepancy should probably be fixed:
$ guile -L ~/src/scheme/bytestructures/
guile> ,use (scheme eval)
guile> (eval '(cond-expand (lp64 #t) (else #f))
(environment '(guile) ; <=== DIFFERENCE HERE
'(bytestructures guile numeri
On 22.10.2020 20:24, Taylan Kammer wrote:
I think the following discrepancy should probably be fixed:
$ guile -L ~/src/scheme/bytestructures/
guile> ,use (scheme eval)
guile> (eval '(cond-expand (lp64 #t) (else #f))
(environment '(guile) ; <
xed)
Taylan
From b607613028f8f6764c03c1d7917434242ee32191 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Taylan Kammer
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 18:12:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Improve support for R6/R7 SRFI module name formats.
Fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/39601>.
Partly fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/40371
7 00:00:00 2001
From: Taylan Kammer
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 15:23:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Use a different SRFI-64 implementation.
* module/srfi/srfi-64.scm: Add imports and other boilerplate for new
implementation.
* module/srfi/srfi-64/execution.body.scm: New file.
* module/srfi/srfi-64/sourc
Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Taylan Kammer
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 15:23:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Use a different SRFI-64 implementation.
* module/srfi/srfi-64.scm: Add imports and other boilerplate for new
implementation.
* module/srfi/srfi-64/execution.body.scm: New file.
* module/srfi
On 10.05.2021 20:25, Taylan Kammer wrote:
>
> - Improved expand-time performance for large test suites
>
I thought it would be a good idea to quantify this, so I
benchmarked the compilation performance of a test suite
of 289 tests (that of the scheme-bytsetructures library),
an
On 11.05.2021 13:32, Taylan Kammer wrote:
>
> Here's a fixed patch-set.
>
And here's another minimally changed one. Sorry about the noise,
but you know how it goes: you publish something to the public, and
soon after notice another edge or two to polish. :-)
The module
I was just skimming through the bug tracker and noticed:
https://bugs.gnu.org/21181
This bug doesn't exist in the proposed implementation.
- Taylan
On 11.05.2021 21:14, Taylan Kammer wrote:
>
> And here's another minimally changed one.
>
Aaaand another of course. on IRC notified me that
there's a way in which both the old and new implementation don't
conform to the standard: they're supposed to uninstall the
On 06.08.2021 16:33, Vijay Marupudi wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I was curious if Guile would be willing to provide a series of
> new procedures for resizing contiguous memory regions.
>
> (bytevector-resize! new-size [fill])
> (vector-resize! new-size [fill])
>
> The [fill] parameter could be used if
On 07.08.2021 13:09, Maxime Devos wrote:
>
> A problem is that this prevents optimisations and can currently
> introduce bugs in concurrent code. Consider the following code:
>
> [... snip ... ]
>
> Greetings,
> Maxime.
>
Couldn't we just state that resizing a vector/bytevector is a
thread-u
On 07.08.2021 23:19, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 12:31:09PM +0200, Taylan Kammer wrote:
>> One consideration is how this should behave in the case of
>> bytevectors that were created from an FFI pointer [...]
>
> Hm. I don't understand. Reallo
On 19.09.2021 09:54, Damien Mattei wrote:
> hello,
> i'm developing an extension to Scheme
> and i need a procedure or macro that define a variable only if it is not bind
> and if it is just set! it.
>
> I can not do it in Guile or any Scheme,and i'm desperately searching a way to
> do that. I f
On 22.09.2021 11:53, Damien Mattei wrote:
> i already do it this way for internal defines ,using a recursive macro that
> build a list of variable using an accumulator. It can works but macro
> expansion seems slow, it was not immediate at compilation on a little example
> (oh nothing more that
On 22.09.2021 23:52, William ML Leslie wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, 4:51 am Taylan Kammer, <mailto:taylan.kam...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 22.09.2021 11:53, Damien Mattei wrote:
> > i already do it this way for internal defines ,using a recursive macro
> th
On 23.09.2021 19:27, Damien Mattei wrote:
> yes i know parsing the whole code is the only portable solution, but it is
> slow,even on a few dozen of lines the slowing is visible ,so i can even think
> of that on one thousand lines...
>
> I finally succeed in Guile with simple piece of code to ma
Responding to myself:
On 23.09.2021 22:27, Taylan Kammer wrote:
> I can't seem to find syntax-local-binding in Guile 2.2 or 3.0. Did you
> have to import some special module, or are you using another version?
Worked when I imported (system syntax internal).
> Either way, I su
On 09.10.2021 14:01, Andrew Goh wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I was wondering if the GNU Guile development team had thought of implementing
> a GNU Guile version for Microsoft Windows operating systems (Win 10, 11), to
> be used as a plug-in on JetBrains Intellij IDEA Ultimate, Community IDE and
On 15.12.2021 11:20, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> While Andy focuses on major improvements to the compiler and VM with a
> long-term vision, I think it would be great to also have people on the
> maintainer team focusing on more day-to-day operations: incremental
> improvements, bug fixes, etc. I t
On 17.12.2021 16:48, Olivier Dion wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Olivier Dion skribis:
>>
>>> I would also like to contribute in some meaningful way. In what way
>>> someone with none wizard knowledge of Scheme can contribute the most to the
>>> project?
>>
>>
On 03.08.2022 11:12, Damien Mattei wrote:
> GNU Guile 3.0.1
> Copyright (C) 1995-2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'.
> This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
> under certain conditions; type `,s
On 03.08.2022 11:50, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
>> Le 3 août 2022 à 11:49, Taylan Kammer a écrit :
>>
>> On 03.08.2022 11:12, Damien Mattei wrote:
>>> GNU Guile 3.0.1
>>> Copyright (C) 1995-2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>>
>>&g
On 12.09.2022 09:42, Damien Mattei wrote:
>
> Hello,
> i can not find in the scheme community a definition of 'case in term of macro
> as for when, unless,while,do... does anyone have it?
> thanks,
> Damien
The RnRS often contain such definitions. The following is taken from
R7RS-small:
(defi
Re. issues with the standard SRFI 64 implementation, let me point out
that I've written an alternative implementation with cleaner code and
behavior of the default test runner; it's part of this (currently
dormant) project:
https://github.com/TaylanUB/scheme-srfis
(I've not yet had time to migrat
On 26.09.2023 10:17, Taylan Kammer wrote:
>
> https://github.com/TaylanUB/scheme-srfis
>
> (I've not yet had time to migrate away from GitHub. Sorry.)
>
Fixed:
https://codeberg.org/taylan/scheme-srfis
--
Taylan
On 30.10.2023 11:24, Ramin Honary wrote:
> Hello Guile developers:
>
> I have come to realize that there are several finalized SRFIs
> published by John Cowan and others, for example, SRFI-133 (vector
> library), SRFI-125 (intermediate hash tables), SRFI-126 (R6RS-based
> hash tables) that were in
On 13.11.2023 15:21, 無無 wrote:
> I have read that in R7RS a library name is defined as:
>
> -> ( + )
> -> |
> ->
> ->
> -> 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
>
> That means that a valid library name would be something like (a b 1),
> where "1" is a valid library na
Thank you for the comments. I agree especially with the part about RnRS needing
to define a broad-ranging standard that allows writing useful libraries in a
portable way. The lack of e.g. networking primitives is extremely limiting and
this always greatly bothered me about RnRS.
I have question
On 24.07.2024 03:06, spacecadet wrote:
> Hi, I didn't see a help-guile list, I hope this isn't out of place
I think the guile-user list might be more appropriate.
> I'm trying to lexically bind a macro to a lexically bound transformer
> procedure
>
> (let ((outer (lambda (x) #''(
> (let-s
On 24.07.2024 19:10, spacecadet wrote:
>> I think the guile-user list might be more appropriate.
>
> Noted
>
>> (let-syntax ((outer (lambda (x) #'(+ 1 2
>> (let-syntax ((inner (lambda (x) (outer x
>> (inner)))
>
> That works, but I guess this isn't possible then
>
> (lamb
38 matches
Mail list logo
