Thanks, I'll check it out!
On Sat, May 29, 2021, 1:55 PM wrote:
> For srfi-64 you should really post your patches to srfi's mailing list
> since Guile uses the reference implementation. There was some discussion
> about switching to another one but it didn't happen. (Yet?)
>
> Some relevant
For srfi-64 you should really post your patches to srfi's mailing list
since Guile uses the reference implementation. There was some discussion
about switching to another one but it didn't happen. (Yet?)
Some relevant links to upstream:
ping!
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, 12:21 AM Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
wrote:
> * module/srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm: fix double test-name evaluation which
> also fix unused variable warnings as a bonus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
> ---
> module/srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm | 36
* module/srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm: fix double test-name evaluation which
also fix unused variable warnings as a bonus.
Signed-off-by: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
---
module/srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm | 36 -
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git
Sorry about the extra noise. The original patch used spaces on the new
lines while testing.scm uses tabs.
Best,
Aleix
* module/srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm: fix double test-name evaluation which
also fix unused variable warnings as a bonus.
Signed-off-by: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
---
module/srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm | 36 -
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git
