Hello,
Colin Woodbury skribis:
> In that case, please hold on the patch. I am currently "rounding out"
> the "one true Transducer API" in several other Lisps, and am close to
> what I consider a representative set of the desirable primitives a
> developer would want out-of-the-box. One I'm done
On 8/18/23 19:03, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Apologies for the delays, we’re pioneering “slow dev” I guess. :-)
Haha no issue at all!
> Could you take a look?
In that case, please hold on the patch. I am currently "rounding out"
the "one true Transducer API" in several other Lisps, and am close
Hi Colin,
Colin Woodbury skribis:
> Hi again, any thoughts on these SRFI-171 extensions?
Looong ago, before we waited for copyright assignment to be on file, I
made minor suggestions on the patch, which I think you haven’t responded
to:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2023-01/
On 8/13/23 04:37, Linus Björnstam wrote:
Hi!
I have finally started getting some computer time again, and I will make sure
to get this into some kind of extra library in the official SRFI repo.
It will not be official, but maybe for a future SRFI based on SRFI 171.
Hi Linus, good to hear
Hi!
I have finally started getting some computer time again, and I will make sure
to get this into some kind of extra library in the official SRFI repo.
It will not be official, but maybe for a future SRFI based on SRFI 171.
--
Linus Björnstam
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, at 14:27, Colin Woodbur
Hi again, any thoughts on these SRFI-171 extensions?
On 5/18/23 09:36, Colin Woodbury wrote:
Hi! Forgive the delay; my copyright assignment for Guile has finally
gone through. Please let me know if the patches are still good!
Colin
On 1/24/23 18:07, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi Colin,
Colin Wo
Hi! Forgive the delay; my copyright assignment for Guile has finally
gone through. Please let me know if the patches are still good!
Colin
On 1/24/23 18:07, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi Colin,
Colin Woodbury skribis:
Sorry if I wasn't clear - I have alright assigned copyright to the FSF
(abou
Hi Colin,
Colin Woodbury skribis:
> Sorry if I wasn't clear - I have alright assigned copyright to the FSF
> (about 1.5 years ago). Things should be good to go, unless I've
> misunderstood.
I checked the records on fencepost.gnu.org and AFAICS, you assigned
copyright for Emacs only (copyright a
Hi Ludovic,
Sorry if I wasn't clear - I have alright assigned copyright to the FSF
(about 1.5 years ago). Things should be good to go, unless I've
misunderstood.
Cheers,
Colin
On 1/24/23 07:17, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi Colin,
Colin Woodbury skribis:
Hi Ludovic, thanks for getting back
Hi Colin,
Colin Woodbury skribis:
> Hi Ludovic, thanks for getting back to me! I've updated the patches as
> you've suggested. I think I've gotten the commit format correct this
> time.
Yup, it’s looks perfect!
> Also, I'll opt to assign copyright to the FSF, as I've already done so
> for Emac
Hi Ludovic, thanks for getting back to me! I've updated the patches as
you've suggested. I think I've gotten the commit format correct this time.
Also, I'll opt to assign copyright to the FSF, as I've already done so
for Emacs (and signed the papers, etc.).
Let there be transduction! Cheers,
11 matches
Mail list logo
