On 2015-09-17 15:07, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
Hi!
I wasn't subscribed before, but got aware of Luis's mockups via IRC.
While I think there's a lot just done right on the website mockup, I
see issues with the logo proposal.
The G in parens concept is fine, but the weighting could be better.
Even
On 18.09.2015 10:53, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
Also, this G looks like Google G one too :)
The point is that this G would not be used in/as stand-alone symbol, as
that part would be taken by the horned parenthesis ;)
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
Le 2015-09-18 00:11, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
Thorsten Wilms writes:
Hi!
I wasn't subscribed before, but got aware of Luis's mockups via
IRC. While I think there's a lot just done right on the website
mockup, I see issues with the logo proposal.
The G in parens concept is
Hi!
I wasn't subscribed before, but got aware of Luis's mockups via IRC.
While I think there's a lot just done right on the website mockup, I see
issues with the logo proposal.
The G in parens concept is fine, but the weighting could be better. Even
then, a G that is all round on the
Thorsten Wilms writes:
> Hi!
>
> I wasn't subscribed before, but got aware of Luis's mockups via
> IRC. While I think there's a lot just done right on the website
> mockup, I see issues with the logo proposal.
>
> The G in parens concept is fine, but the weighting could be
>