Hi Neil!
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But why not commit the benchmark code anyway? If there are some
> benchmarks there worth running, the more incentive for someone (me?)
> to clean up the framework code!
You managed to make me change my mind and I just committed `read.bm'.
;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Would it also make sense to commit the benchmark? We already have a
>> "benchmark-suite" directory.
>
> I had a quick look and it seems this directory would need a little bit
> of cleanup (e.g., "#!../libgu
Hi,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, all looks good to me.
Thanks, applied.
> Would it also make sense to commit the benchmark? We already have a
> "benchmark-suite" directory.
I had a quick look and it seems this directory would need a little bit
of cleanup (e.g., "#!../libguil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> Small I/O functions like `scm_getc ()' deserve to be inlined. For
> instance, Andy measured it some time ago:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/6639
>
> I'm planning to apply the attached patch to both `master' and 1.8.
>
Hello,
Small I/O functions like `scm_getc ()' deserve to be inlined. For
instance, Andy measured it some time ago:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/6639
I'm planning to apply the attached patch to both `master' and 1.8.
To get an idea of its benefit, I run the attached "benchma
