On Tue 19 Apr 2011 03:15, CRLF0710 crlf0...@gmail.com writes:
Guile 2.0 has been there for some time. Why there's still not any
guile-2.0 package in linux distributions?
Did they have trouble packaging it?
It's only been out for a couple months, and there are a number of
reverse dependencies,
Hello!
Dmitry Dzhus d...@dzhus.org writes:
CRLF0710 wrote:
Guile 2.0 has been there for some time. Why there's still not any
guile-2.0 package in linux distributions?
There's a Guile 2.0 ebuild in Gentoo Portage main tree, also Lisp team
provides ebuilds for building trunk version of
Guile 2.0 has been there for some time. Why there's still not any
guile-2.0 package in linux distributions?
Did they have trouble packaging it?
By the way, is the .go file portable? Building them(rnrs, ice-9 etc)
during compiling guile takes so long...
Thanks
--
CrLF.0710
I don't know about the packaging, but I think the .go files depend on
the endianness of the machine but nothing else. So you should be able
to move them between different little-endian or big-endian machines
(unless I'm wrong). But it seems much safer to me to just compile
things. You shouldn't
Thanks. I want to deploy guile 2.0 to about ten machines ( of our
development team members'). Since they have the same endianness maybe
i'll give this a try...
But now i worry most about the deployment of our final software. The
deployment will be in September. Well, most of the dependencies can
