>However, I personally hope that Guile will continue to be friendly towards
>those using it as an embedded language. There, a C API is important. There
>*is* a downside in moving to Scheme from that perspective, but that is fine as
>long as it is easy to call Scheme from C. The typical use case
>Regarding the junk, I very much agree. I also look forward to getting rid of
>ice-9 :). As has been spoken about here previously, I suggest that we design a
>new module hierarchy, introduce aliases for module bindings, and still supply
>the old module hierarchy during a few years for backward
