Hi Jan,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> From ed1507425da819363cc6592ee033076838c82051 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 17:31:17 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add dynamic relocation support, default off.
>
> 2005-06-08 Jan Nieuwenhuizen
>
> * config
Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 29-01-2011 om 22:39 [+0100]:
Hi Ludovic,
> I’m not sure about this patch. My feeling is that it would take more
> than this to allow Guile to be truly relocatable, e.g., all of
> $GUILE_LOAD_PATH, $GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH, $LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
> etc. would have to wor
Heya Jan,
On Mon 31 Jan 2011 21:26, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> I realised we need GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH too. Added that
> in this new patch. I added a bit more explanation: this should
> be used together with a sane -rpath $ORIGIN/../lib build.
What about the extensions paths? Are all pa
Andy Wingo schreef op ma 31-01-2011 om 21:50 [+0100]:
Hi Andy,
> What about the extensions paths? Are all paths from libpath.h
> relocatable?
>
> Curiously yours,
Good question, we [LilyPond installs] never needed/used those,
I guess. I can imagine that more paths need to be added, this
was s
[cc: list]
Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 31-01-2011 om 22:00 [+0100]:
Hi,
> Your patch lacks this RPATH magic, though.
Yes, we have that in our GUB cross build system. Possibly this
is a thing/feature request for libtool.
> Perhaps it should check
> whether ‘-Wl,-rpath='$ORIGIN/../lib'’ works
On Mon 31 Jan 2011 21:55, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>> What about the extensions paths? Are all paths from libpath.h
>> relocatable?
>
> Good question, we [LilyPond installs] never needed/used those,
> I guess. I can imagine that more paths need to be added, this
> was sufficient for guile-1.8,
Hello!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 29-01-2011 om 22:39 [+0100]:
[...]
>> I’m not sure about this patch. My feeling is that it would take more
>> than this to allow Guile to be truly relocatable, e.g., all of
>> $GUILE_LOAD_PATH, $GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH, $LD_LIB
Hi!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 31-01-2011 om 22:00 [+0100]:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Your patch lacks this RPATH magic, though.
>
> Yes, we have that in our GUB cross build system. Possibly this
> is a thing/feature request for libtool.
>
>> Perhaps it should check
>> whether
Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 31-01-2011 om 23:09 [+0100]:
> I mean, if this feature goes in, then ‘configure’ should check whether
> this incantation is supported (it may not work with combinations other
> than GCC + GNU ld) and give up if it’s not.
Yes, I understand.
> When it’s supported, ‘li
Andy Wingo schreef op ma 31-01-2011 om 22:30 [+0100]:
> May I suggest then a bit more rigor in the choice of paths.
Sure.
> What paths does Guile use?
Good question. I'm rather new to 1.9 series.
> Are they entirely taken from argv0
The only thing this reloc patch takes from argv0 is BINDIR
10 matches
Mail list logo
