code, which in effect
gives early termination to every `map' user, regardless of whether that
module has imported srfi-1 or goops. Sometimes I think that Mikael put
the Oops in Goops for a reason ;-)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
loaded, srfi-1 extends the `map' and `for-each'
primitive generics with its own early-termination code, which in effect
gives early termination to every `map' user, regardless of whether that
module has imported srfi-1 or goops. Sometimes I think that Mikael put
the Oops in Goops for a reason
and if GOOPS gets loaded, srfi-1 extends the `map' and `for-each'
primitive generics with its own early-termination code, which in effect
gives early termination to every `map' user, regardless of whether that
module has imported srfi-1 or goops. Sometimes I think that Mikael put
the Oops
On Thu 05 May 2011 17:24, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
If you call `map' or `for-each' with more than one list, our versions of
these operators will detect if the lists are of unequal length, and
throw an error in that case.
However, SRFI-1 has long provided an extension to this, to
, and instead of
failing nicely it corrupted memory.
This would also allow us to get rid of the hack in srfi-1.c in which,
when and if GOOPS gets loaded, srfi-1 extends the `map' and `for-each'
primitive generics with its own early-termination code, which in effect
gives early termination to every
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Thu 05 May 2011 18:26, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
If you call `map' or `for-each' with more than one list, our versions of
these operators will detect if the lists are of unequal length, and
throw an error
Hi,
On Thu 05 May 2011 22:21, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Yes, and I think we can keep rewriting SRFI-1 in Scheme, even in 2.0.
So I implemented map in Scheme
Ooh, interesting. :-)
I pushed to stable-2.0. Let me know if you want me to back it out.
Cheers,
Andy
--
