Hi,
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, yes you're right. I was anticipating the abolition of
ChangeLogs, but prematurely.
Eh. ;-) Eventually, at some point, we'll abolish them for real.
I've added the ChangeLogs in now, but I'm not sure I did the merge and
push correctly; can
2008/7/16 Ludovic Courtès [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Speaking of which, your latest commits did not include a ChangeLog
entry. :-)
Sorry, yes you're right. I was anticipating the abolition of
ChangeLogs, but prematurely.
I've added the ChangeLogs in now, but I'm not sure I did the merge and
push
2008/7/17 Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/7/16 Ludovic Courtès [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Speaking of which, your latest commits did not include a ChangeLog
entry. :-)
Sorry, yes you're right. I was anticipating the abolition of
ChangeLogs, but prematurely.
I've added the ChangeLogs in now,
Hi,
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached is my attempt (thus far) at such a program. Comments
welcome, of course. It would be good if we could reach a clear
decision on whether to abolish ChangeLogs, or not!
Speaking of which, your latest commits did not include a ChangeLog
2008/7/15 Ludovic Courtès [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello!
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached is my attempt (thus far) at such a program. Comments
welcome, of course.
IIUC, the idea is to fill in `ChangeLog' files as usual and then let
this program extract entries from there and put
2008/5/22 Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There was discussion on Git + ChangeLog on the gnulib list about half a
year back. I can't recall the outcome, but do remember one side effect
was that someone wrote a merge program specifically for ChangeLog files,
that could hook into Git
() Andy Wingo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
() Fri, 09 May 2008 17:38:12 +0200
Now that we've switched to git, hows about moving our changelogs to
ChangeLog.old, and just using commit logs? We can still generate
changelogs on release, if that's a desire.
There was discussion on Git + ChangeLog on
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
Now that we've switched to git, hows about moving our changelogs to
ChangeLog.old, and just using commit logs? We can still generate
changelogs on release, if that's a desire.
I'd be tempted to do that, but among the many GNU projects that switched
to Git,
Hi Neil,
On Sat 10 May 2008 00:41, Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andy Wingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that we've switched to git, hows about moving our changelogs to
ChangeLog.old, and just using commit logs? We can still generate
changelogs on release, if that's a desire.
Do
Heya,
On Mon 12 May 2008 22:12, Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm happy with your suggestion to retire ChangeLog. Perhaps you should
add something to HACKING about this, though?
Sure, I can do that. I'll send something yall's way on Wednesday.
I'm more than happy to have a few brain
Hi,
Now that we've switched to git, hows about moving our changelogs to
ChangeLog.old, and just using commit logs? We can still generate
changelogs on release, if that's a desire.
I can do something about the latter, if you all think it's a good idea.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hi,
Andy Wingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that we've switched to git, hows about moving our changelogs to
ChangeLog.old, and just using commit logs? We can still generate
changelogs on release, if that's a desire.
I'd be tempted to do that, but among the many GNU projects that switched
to
Andy Wingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Now that we've switched to git, hows about moving our changelogs to
ChangeLog.old, and just using commit logs? We can still generate
changelogs on release, if that's a desire.
Do you mean that we would still have the same level of detail that we
13 matches
Mail list logo
