Congrats! You survived from that manual parser! :-)
But I'm concern the parser is hard to extend if we need mordern Lua grammar.
2013-9-10 AM4:20，Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com：
So, it's been 5 months since I originally posted those patches about
Guile Lua. How time flies when you are
Hey guys,
I was just thinking about Guile Lua (and feeling guilty that I never
did finish it). Anyway, I never did make any progress after my 2012
posts. I got a little discouraged while implementing Lua's multiple
values everywhere, to be honest.
By all means, feel free to take over the lua
multiple
values everywhere, to be honest.
By all means, feel free to take over the lua branch. As long as it's
okay with Ludo, Andy, whoever is in charge these days, I think you
should push to it with reckless abandon instead of submitting patches
since it isn't used in guile (yet).
On Wed, Apr 17
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
The current issues with lua vs master are as follows
1) application has been renamed to call on master
2) sequence has been replaced with seq which is not quite a drop-in
3) while was being compiled into something with improper scoping.
I have
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
I don't know much about Lua, but I think I could do the following.
1. Fix the lua-lexer failure.
2. Disable or fix[1] the variable-arguments functionality.
3. Rebase or merge with modern stable or master
4. Fix the errors that arise as a result of
hi ijp!
Here're some rough thoughts about the patch:
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 05:50 +, Ian Price wrote:
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
I don't know much about Lua, but I think I could do the following.
1. Fix the lua-lexer failure.
2. Disable or fix[1] the
Nala Ginrut nalagin...@gmail.com writes:
+ (let* ((old-vararg-function *vararg-function*)
+ (old-vararg-gensym *vararg-gensym*))
Is 'let' better here?
Actually, I didn't notice that it was a let*. It's arguably a little
more confusing, but not really harmful.
+ ;; refers
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com skribis:
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
I don't know much about Lua, but I think I could do the following.
1. Fix the lua-lexer failure.
2. Disable or fix[1] the variable-arguments functionality.
3. Rebase or merge with modern stable or
Prompted by the recent discussion of lua/zile on guile-user, I decided
to checkout what the actual state of the Lua branch is.
First off, not all of the tests pass.
- lua-standard-library and lua-eval pass with no problems.
- lua-lexer has 1 failure, which is easy fixed (change #:vararg
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
I don't know much about Lua, but I think I could do the following.
1. Fix the lua-lexer failure.
2. Disable or fix[1] the variable-arguments functionality.
3. Rebase or merge with modern stable or master
4. Fix the errors that arise as a result of
10 matches
Mail list logo
