[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
There is probably code that relies on redefinitions being silently
interpreted as a `set!', I'm afraid. So I don't think Guile should
start issuing warnings for redefinitions by default.
The warnings would be about redefinitions that would not have
Kevin Ryde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We we already warn when importing something that shadows a core
definition, so we could as well warn when redefining one.
I thought about that for my lint program and decided it'd be too
annoying to report local
