Re: testing arity

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:19:28AM -0500, Jon Wilson wrote: Hi, Is there a good way to determine the number of arguments that a given procedure will take? Here's a fishing rod ;-) | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ guile | guile (apropos arity) | (ice-9 session): arity

Re: gh_ to scm_ manual bug

Jon Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: scm_c_primitive_load ... scm_c_eval_string Thanks, I added them. ___ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user

Re: testing arity

Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And if you're not keen on parsing arity's output, see its definition in (ice-9 session) for the procedure properties that it queries to produce this. (procedure-property obj 'arity) being the operative part, it gives a list of (required-count

Re: testing arity

Thanks, Neil. Sounds like an excellent answer! Regards, Jon Neil Jerram wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:19:28AM -0500, Jon Wilson wrote: Hi, Is there a good way to determine the number of arguments that a given procedure will take? Here's a fishing rod ;-)