"David Fang" wrote:
> So this means I should be able to stop the dynwind from
> plowing through any pure C++ function, in theory, right?
Yes.
> (I'm still itching to upgrade the libguile API for C++,
> if I only had the time to futz with it...)
IMHO this is possible only by wrapping libguile wit
> "David Fang" wrote:
> > C++ relies heavily on constructor-destructor duality
> > [...]
> > The implementation of guile's C-style exceptions using
> > setjmp/longjmp, however breaks this universal law.
> > [...]
> > In the event of scm_error_scm(), the destructors that
> > *should* be called in th
