Julian Graham jool...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Guilers,
Alright, I've been banging my head against this for several weeks now
and only just had the time to sit down and research this: If you use a
symbol in an `(ice-9 syncase)' macro definition that's bound in the
lexical closure in which that
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
Nothing, this is a deficiency in Guile:
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?20941. I wonder why it is marked as
invalid, though.
Regardless of how it's marked, I'm still hoping to get to this soon.
Neil
Julian Graham jool...@gmail.com writes:
This does strike me as a serious problem (and it's a spanner in the
works for implementing R6RS libraries). In effect, isn't the bug
saying that Guile's syncase macros aren't totally hygienic? That is,
in my example, if you provide your own binding
