On Sat 26 Mar 2011 10:53, Johan Hidding writes:
> Hello Ludo',
> I had a chat with Mark Weaver on IRC; he could reproduce the error.
> The output shows basic GSL working, but GSL+CBLAS failing. I found a
> way to -combine the static versions into a single shared library using
> a trick I found on
On Thu 31 Mar 2011 16:23, Andy Wingo writes:
> On Tue 22 Mar 2011 09:51, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
>
>> If efficiency is a concern, another approach is to wrap
>> sendfile(2) or something like it.
>
> IMHO we should bind sendfile(2) in Guile itself.
Well, I guess I take that back:
http://thre
On Sat 19 Mar 2011 17:47, ro...@lavabit.com writes:
>> ro...@lavabit.com writes:
>>
>>> I gave a second read to the manual and found:
>>>
>>> "The handler should return two values: the response, as a
>>> record from (web response), and the response body as a string,
>>> bytevector,
>>> or #f if n
On Tue 22 Mar 2011 09:51, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> If efficiency is a concern, another approach is to wrap
> sendfile(2) or something like it.
IMHO we should bind sendfile(2) in Guile itself.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
On Wed 16 Mar 2011 18:35, ro...@lavabit.com writes:
> I'm unable to find where "unparse-uri" is defined, maybe this has been
> deprecated before 2.0 release from (web uri) module. I think it was
> replaced with "uri->string".
Indeed. Fixed the manual in git, thanks.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org
On Thu 10 Mar 2011 02:06, David Pirotte writes:
> Just because I hit it today i am reporting this, but with low priority. I got
> into
> this small problem [a very small and ridiculous example for the sake of
> 'demonstration']: the doc says [6.17.7]
Don't be bashful, that was a good bug! Fixe
Hi Juhani,
Sorry for the delay in the response!
On Wed 02 Mar 2011 09:22, "Juhani Viheräkoski" writes:
> $ ./test-script
> ;;; note: source file /home/misty/moonshine/yarg/scripts/./race
> ;;; newer than compiled
> /home/misty/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-4-2.0/home/misty/moonshine/yarg/scr
On Wed 02 Mar 2011 23:00, Marco Maggi writes:
> it is my understanding that WITH-SYNTAX has a body like let.
Indeed. Fixed in git, thanks.
In the future, note that bug reports are better sent to
bug-gu...@gnu.org.
Regards,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
