Hi,
I am trying to see if there is a way to determine if a program is in the
path (i.e. a bit like which), returning a #t or #f answer. I was
looking execl and execlp.
The documentation for execl says:
Executes the file named by path as a new process image
what is path ? I'm guessing
Hello,
Where is guile-gnome located hosted these days?
Is there one for current guile?
thanks,
ariel
Hello old friend!
On Tue 22 Nov 2011 20:37, Ariel Rios arielte...@gmail.com writes:
Where is guile-gnome located hosted these days?
http://gnu.org/s/guile-gnome/
You'll need to use g-wrap and guile-gnome from git, but it does work
with Guile 2.0.
Peace,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
Hello,
So after battling to compile g-wrap (I needed a macro in gettext) I
have bee able to install guile-gnome but I am getting:
[ariel@~/src/guile-gnome-platform/gtk/examples/tutorial]$
guile-gnome-2 -l hello.scm
;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
;;; or pass
-[ Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 05:34:00PM -0600, Ariel Rios ]
Hello,
So after battling to compile g-wrap (I needed a macro in gettext) I
have bee able to install guile-gnome but I am getting:
[ariel@~/src/guile-gnome-platform/gtk/examples/tutorial]$
guile-gnome-2 -l hello.scm
;;; note:
I guess I was tired and didn't look that I needed guile-cairo and some
other stuff. I've got it running now. Surprises coming.
ariel
2011/11/22 ri...@happyleptic.org:
-[ Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 05:34:00PM -0600, Ariel Rios ]
Hello,
So after battling to compile g-wrap (I needed a macro in
I think there's a bug.
(execlp ls ) will access.
Since the second parameter is optional, scm_execlp doesn't handle exec_argv
unbounded situation.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Paul Emsley paul.ems...@bioch.ox.ac.ukwrote:
Hi,
I am trying to see if there is a way to determine if a program
Well, I noticed your second question. ;-)
The common method to determine a executable file is stat:perms, you may
check it out in the manual for details.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Nala Ginrut nalagin...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there's a bug.
(execlp ls ) will access.
Since the second
