You're right about null? being a problem. `Nothing` suggests an option
type. What about 'nada' or 'nix'?
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:45 PM HiPhish wrote:
> 1) Huh, I didn't think this would work because the record type is already
> nil,
> but apparently it does. Good to know
>
> 2) `null` is bad
1) Huh, I didn't think this would work because the record type is already nil,
but apparently it does. Good to know
2) `null` is bad because the predicate would be `null?`, which collides even
worse with Scheme. Any other suggestions? `nothing`? `nul` with one ell? I
think it would be too easy
