On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:15 PM Per Bothner wrote:
For the record, I'm extremely leery of the more-is-better approach.
> We seem to be adding a large number of very large APIs, which seems
> to be contrary to the Scheme ideal of small well-chosen primitives
> that work synergistic well together.
On 1/16/19 6:27 AM, John Cowan wrote:
So what is happening is that people are voting for more rather than less, as
with the Red Edition. This encourages me that I'm going in a sensible
direction with the large language.
For the record, I'm extremely leery of the more-is-better approach.
We
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:56 AM Zelphir Kaltstahl <
zelphirkaltst...@gmail.com> wrote:
For example, what is the difference
> between PEG parsing and parser combinators?
>
Both of them do top-down parsing (try to match the top-level grammar rule,
which is
done by trying to match the lower-level
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:43:01AM +0100, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
> > I am still unsure about the theoretical CS stuff: What kind of parsers
> > one can possibly write with parser combinators [...]
[...]
> > Have you looked at the PEG parser recently added to guile? It does
> >
Hi Swedebugia,
I did not notice a PEG parser has been added. How did you notice this?
Maybe there is another blog for new additions to Guile?
Do you know a good text, which explains differences between the
different approaches to parsing? For example, what is the difference
