On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:49 AM Catonano wrote:
>
> I opened a new ticket on the guile-hall repo
> https://gitlab.com/a-sassmannshausen/guile-hall/issues/4
>
> I remind everybody that guile-hall is an attempt to create a command to
> create and manage Guile based projects instrumented with the Au
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:34 PM Zelphir Kaltstahl <
zelphirkaltst...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am not sure I have a sufficiently informed opinion about SRFIs and
> such things. How experienced should a person be, as to not simply vote
> for something that superficially might sound great, but actually is
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ivan Raikov wrote:
> Isn't the difference with R6RS that R7RS-large draws extensively on
> SRFIs which are indeed attempts to codify existing practices?
>
SRFIs don't always codify existing practice, including the SRFIs drawn on
in past, present, and future R7RS-
On 1/17/19 11:49 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:43:01AM +0100, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
>
>>> I am still unsure about the theoretical CS stuff: What kind of parsers
>>> one can possibly write with parser combinators [...]
> [...]
>
>>> Have you looked at the PEG
