Re: [ANN] guile-wiredtiger 0.8.1

2019-05-17 Thread Amirouche
On 2019-05-17 12:11, Amirouche wrote: The key word is fine-tuning. That is what makes the database works. I made a quick fix that was planned but forgot about and made a new release. Here is the diff:

Re: [ANN] guile-wiredtiger 0.8.0

2019-05-17 Thread Amirouche
On 2019-05-17 13:24, Nala Ginrut wrote: Congrats! Do you think it could be standalone NOSQL database and integrated to Artanis? Thanks! My plan to work with it embedded in the scheme process. So no, it is not stand-alone for the time being.

Re: [ANN] guile-wiredtiger 0.8.0

2019-05-17 Thread Nala Ginrut
Congrats! Do you think it could be standalone NOSQL database and integrated to Artanis? On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 6:14 PM Amirouche wrote: > > On 2019-05-16 23:05, Amirouche wrote: > > > > - my program leaking memory. I am not sure but it is unlikely that > > guile > > part of the code leaks

Re: [ANN] guile-wiredtiger 0.8.0

2019-05-17 Thread Amirouche
On 2019-05-16 23:05, Amirouche wrote: - my program leaking memory. I am not sure but it is unlikely that guile part of the code leaks memory [...] AND I experimented with both Chez Scheme and Python, they both seems to leak memory. The latter takes more time but in the end the result is

Re: [ANN] guile-file-names 0.2

2019-05-17 Thread Brandon Invergo
Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver writes: > Sorry, I meant to give an example of this. Please see srfi/srfi-45.scm > in the Guile source distribution for an example of the preferred way to > override core bindings, such that only modules that import your module > are affected. Thanks for the example. I