Hi folks!
Artanis has been using in product, that is to say, working stable and keep
maintaining. Artanis aims for rapid development just like Ruby on Rails. So
that you may try your different ideas quickly.
If anyone is willing to try Artanis for the modern forum of Guile
community, I'd like to
Hi Arne!
As one of the developers of AIscm, I think MNIST is ready for you.
Currently, most critical things are provided, not only Tensorflow, but also
imagick/ffmpeg/opencv...etc.
However, for real cases, we still need user friendly APIs. Now, most things
are too low level.
I have a plan to write
Agree it'll be a major aid to decreasing the learning curve. For now the
only way to analyse a variable in a script is to (pk) it, which is annoying
when it's a record/alist etc. Need to refine the pk several times or write
a custom printer.
Not sure how much knowledge of debugger is required,
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Hi Jan,
Jan Wedekind writes:
Hi Basile,
I have implemented Tensorflow bindings for Guile:
http://wedesoft.github.io/aiscm/
Let me know if you have any problems installing it.
Is aiscm already at a stage where I could experiment with using
On 10/23/19 2:33 PM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 01:25:44PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:48:13 +0200
>> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:16:34AM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
>>> I only
Hi Jan,
Jan Wedekind writes:
> Hi Basile,
> I have implemented Tensorflow bindings for Guile:
> http://wedesoft.github.io/aiscm/
> Let me know if you have any problems installing it.
Is aiscm already at a stage where I could experiment with using it for
handwriting recognition even though I
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 03:43:26PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> But perhaps we need
> bridges between cultures and not just between tools. And that
> takes deep thinking (and people instead of machines, maybe).
>
I believe good mailing list etiquette is similar to good forum
etiquette.
I believe mailman 2 as used on lists.gnu.org is the backend we care
about here. I would prefer it if the mailing list Web frontend would
work as a MUA producing messages that look good in plain text,
monospace e-mail clients. The MBOX from selected GNU mailman lists
would be the “forum” threads
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 09:09:46PM +0200, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> Florian, would Nala Ginrut's Artanis be a useful framework to base a
> bulletin board system on?
>
> https://web-artanis.com/
>
Thank you for reminding me. I had thought of Artanis, but only had a
cursory look at it before.
Florian, would Nala Ginrut's Artanis be a useful framework to base a
bulletin board system on?
https://web-artanis.com/
Den ons 23 okt. 2019 16:15pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) <
pelzflor...@pelzflorian.de> skrev:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 03:47:21PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct
Hi!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 5:33 AM bas...@starynkevitch.net <
bas...@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
>
> Hello list,
>
> I am looking for a binding (glue code) between the TensorFlow library and
> Guile. I want to play a bit with TensorFlow using Guile.
>
> Does such a beast exist?
>
> PS. I really
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:43:26 +0200
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:37:24AM +0100, Chris Vine wrote:
> > "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > I would prefer eventually having a forum/bulletin board-like Web
> > > interface to mailing lists in Guile and until then stick to
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 03:47:21PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 02:33:43PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > If there isn’t one already, then I would like to start working on a
> > written in Guile [...]
>
> Hmmm. I might be your first
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:48:13AM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:16:34AM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> > Regarding the mailling list, many projects (among GNOME) have or will
> > adopt https://www.discourse.org/ [...]
> I only know that subscribing to
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 02:33:43PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
[...]
> If there isn’t one already, then I would like to start working on a
> written in Guile [...]
Hmmm. I might be your first contributor :)
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:37:24AM +0100, Chris Vine wrote:
> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote:
[...]
> > I would prefer eventually having a forum/bulletin board-like Web
> > interface to mailing lists in Guile and until then stick to pure
> > mailing lists.
>
> That's pretty much what
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 01:25:44PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:48:13 +0200
> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:16:34AM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> > I only know that subscribing to GNOME Discourse required Javascript
>
Hello list,
I am looking for a binding (glue code) between the TensorFlow library and
Guile. I want to play a bit with TensorFlow using Guile.
Does such a beast exist?
PS. I really hate Python, and I am allergic to its syntax with significant
spaces (even if I am aware that the semantics of
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:48:13 +0200
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:16:34AM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> I only know that subscribing to GNOME Discourse required Javascript
> and its mail headers are less pretty compared to mailman.
>
These are the reasons
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:48:13 +0200
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:16:34AM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> > Regarding the mailling list, many projects (among GNOME) have or will
> > adopt https://www.discourse.org/. It has a per-user mailling list mode
> > but
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 02:57:03AM +0200, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
> You did not address the other point I raised though: Dependency on a
> third party server (and all the implications, when/if it gets hacked
> again).
A matrix server and its coordination server could be hosted by anyone;
AFAIK
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:16:34AM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> Regarding the mailling list, many projects (among GNOME) have or will
> adopt https://www.discourse.org/. It has a per-user mailling list mode
> but it can not bridge mailman. My guess is that a discourse instance
> only for GNU
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 2:17 PM Amirouche Boubekki <
amirouche.boube...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Regarding the mailling list, many projects (among GNOME) have or will
> adopt https://www.discourse.org/. It has a per-user mailling list mode
> but it can not bridge mailman. My guess is that a discourse
Le dim. 20 oct. 2019 à 08:14, John Cowan a écrit :
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 2:11 AM Todor Kondić wrote:
>
> > But, I doubt any of them would find it natural to take a step further and
> > participate in GNU itself (ugh, now I sound like a preacher of a new age
> > religion). To my knowledge,
24 matches
Mail list logo
