When scripts with load-extension are compiled, the compiler does not know
what symbols are defined in the extension so you may get warnings. Are you
getting an error or just the warning?
On 4/5/21 10:44 AM, Paul Emsley wrote:
Hi Linas,
Thanks for your reply.
Let me clarify if I can. I have
Hi Linas,
Thanks for your reply.
Let me clarify if I can. I have many C++ functions that I would like to use
from scheme. I am using
SWIG to generate wrappers for these functions, and these get added
at the "root module"
http://www.swig.org/Doc3.0/Guile.html
The default linkage is the
Hi Linus,
thank you for your tipps!
Linus Björnstam writes:
> Can you use the procedural part of syntax-rules? You have the power of
> using scheme at expansion time, which means you could do list-ref all
> you want.
>
> That "syntax-rules" is of course syntax-case.
>
> The only thing is
Hi,
I am bringing my swigged Gtk2 + guile 1.8.8 + guile-gtk application up to date
and I'd like some help please.
My SWIG usage wraps many function, including enhanced_coot_ligand_p(). I am
confused between the difference between
functions that are available from C/C++ and those from a scheme
Hi Paul,
Conventionally, a guile module would look something like
(define-module (test-embedding))
(use-modules (srfi srfi-1)) ; .. etc
(define (enahanced-ligand-coot-p) #t) ; etc.
(export enahanced-ligand-coot-p)
In your example, you never explained how "enahanced-ligand-coot-p"
On 05.04.2021 13:30, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In dryads-wake I need selection of the element in a list in a macro from
> user-input. Currently I have multiple macros, and the correct one (which
> strips the non-selected choices) is selected in a simple cond:
>
>
On Monday, 5 April 2021 13:30:21 CEST you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In dryads-wake I need selection of the element in a list in a macro from
> user-input. Currently I have multiple macros, and the correct one (which
> strips the non-selected choices) is selected in a simple cond:
>
> (define-syntax-rule
That "syntax-rules" is of course syntax-case.
Try writing it first with unhygienic macros and get that working before porting
to syntax-case if you don't know the ins-and-outs of syntax-case.
--
Linus Björnstam
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, at 14:21, Linus Björnstam wrote:
> Can you use the
Can you use the procedural part of syntax-rules? You have the power of using
scheme at expansion time, which means you could do list-ref all you want.
The only thing is that guile lacks syntax->list, so sometimes you have to
manually turn it into a list. Say you are matching ((_ stuff ...)
Hi,
In dryads-wake I need selection of the element in a list in a macro from
user-input. Currently I have multiple macros, and the correct one (which
strips the non-selected choices) is selected in a simple cond:
(define-syntax-rule (Choose resp . choices)
"Ask questions, apply consequences"
Hi,
I am trying to bring my swigged Gtk2 + guile 1.8.8 + guile-gtk application up
to date and I'd like some help please.
My SWIG usage wraps many function, including enhanced_coot_ligand_p(). I am
confused between the difference between
functions that are available from C/C++ and those from a
11 matches
Mail list logo
