Hello Guile Users!
I have some code at
https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/guile-examples/src/63af5250aa5a45d68bc6bd2d6193d2a6fb127f24/shell/example-04-using-popen-get-out-and-error-with-ports.scm:
(import (ice-9 popen)
(ice-9 textual-ports)
(ice-9 binary-ports)
Oh thank you! I missed this even after reading the code dozens of times haha
Cheers!
On Tue, 08 Mar 2022, Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski wrote:
> Hello Guilers,
>
> Hope you are all fine and safe.
>
> In the following code, I have a test which should check if my result is
> correct.
>
> If you change the expected string value "1 run, 1 failed" the assert
> procedure does not throw.
>
Hello Zelphir,
Zelphir Kaltstahl writes:
> I have questions regarding this workaround:
>
> Can you explain how and why this works? I have tried to make sense of it and
> here are my notes so far (reference:
>
Jean Abou Samra writes:
>>> There is also a felicitous feedback effect in that because the
>>> baseline compiler is much smaller than the CPS compiler, it takes less
>>> time to macro-expand —
>>> https://wingolog.org/archives/2020/06/03/a-baseline-compiler-for-guile
>
> As far as I
> Le 9 mars 2022 à 08:53, "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" a écrit
> :
>
>
> Maxime Devos writes:
>> Jean Abou Samra schreef op wo 09-03-2022 om 00:31 [+0100]:
>>> In summary, the less Guile optimizes, the faster LilyPond runs. Is that
>>> something expected?
>>
>> I don't think so, but I
Maxime Devos writes:
> Jean Abou Samra schreef op wo 09-03-2022 om 00:31 [+0100]:
>> In summary, the less Guile optimizes, the faster LilyPond runs. Is that
>> something expected?
>
> I don't think so, but I don't have a clue how this happens ...
Do I understand it correctly that Lilypond has
