On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 1:00 PM Mikael Djurfeldt
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 11:53 AM James Crake-Merani
> wrote:
>
>> On 18/03/2023 08:29, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>>
>> > My take is that such potentially society-shattering technologies
>> > don't belong in the hands of corporations which h
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 11:53 AM James Crake-Merani
wrote:
> On 18/03/2023 08:29, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > My take is that such potentially society-shattering technologies
> > don't belong in the hands of corporations which have no choice
> > but to maximize their return on investment. But p
On 18/03/2023 08:29, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
My take is that such potentially society-shattering technologies
don't belong in the hands of corporations which have no choice
but to maximize their return on investment. But perhaps that's me.
Yes, I find it concerning that this technology is owne
chatGPT is using the "static" 2021 free data available on internet ,free
databases,... it knows poorly after 2021 as "they" say.
Without the human intelligence that has create all the data chatGPT can do
nothing.
Now people use chatGPT to create poor quality data stored on the internet
web page
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 07:42:15AM +, James Crake-Merani wrote:
> Hi,
[...]
> I think, at least for now, that our jobs are safe.
My fears are not that much about our jobs. Rather about people
believing the marketing hype. There are already enough life
changing decisions taken by such crude,
Hi James, I agree with most of what you say.
What I find amazing, though, is that a comparably simple network
architecture can still be so capable. It shows the power of the large
volume of training data. After all, it is a large portion of the part of
human culture that is exposed on the internet
Hi,
I think some students think that ChatGPT is this magical AI which can do
their work for them, when in reality ChatGPT is really poor at writing
code. According to the paper on ChatGPT 4[1], in easy Leetcode
challenges, ChatGPT 4 does decently although 3.5 still does poorly with
a score of
