Op 11-09-2023 om 20:42 schreef Andy Tai:
Is using Guile, or a similar Scheme implementation, to re-implement
make or meson realistic?
Meson seems to have straightforward syntax and semantics, and
‘meson.build’ isn't actually Python code unlike what you might expect,
so I think that a meson
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>
> I think this already exist in GNU make. Recent versions of it can be
> extended in GNU guile:
This feature is disabled on most distributions AFAIK.
What I meant is a 100% Scheme build system.
Here is a project defintion of mine for Libpatch
On 9/12/23 15:56, Olivier Dion wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Andy Tai wrote:
Is using Guile, or a similar Scheme implementation, to re-implement
make or meson realistic?
By re-implementing do you mean re-writing Make with Guile? That ought
to be realistic, but I really do not see the point
Hi all,
Guixers of the world (or more simply, from the London area) unite!
烙
Unbelievable, we've reached our fourth event already, which will be held
at the very heart of the City of London. Join us to talk about Guix,
Guile, Scheme & Lisp, and all things Free Software. Bring your laptop
Hello!
Le mardi 12 septembre 2023 à 09:56 -0400, Olivier Dion a écrit :
> What is more realistic and useful is to make a build system in Guile
> where the DSL that replaces Makefiles is Scheme.
Since make is only a small part of a useful build system, I think it is
way easier to re-implement
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Andy Tai wrote:
> Is using Guile, or a similar Scheme implementation, to re-implement
> make or meson realistic?
By re-implementing do you mean re-writing Make with Guile? That ought
to be realistic, but I really do not see the point of it.
What is more realistic and
(forwarding to guile-user because I forgot to reply-all)
> Is using Guile, or a similar Scheme implementation, to re-implement
> make or meson realistic?
Andy-
I did actually try to do a make in Guile once. As it turns out, _make_
as a language is rather harder than it looks, especially if you
