> I don't this is possible without building guile using --without-threads
> argument to configure. Otherwise, the mutl-threaded gc is included.
Good to know, thanks. I'll have to figure out a way to use clone+exec
safely, then (calling process is multi-threaded), probably by writing an
extension i
I'm trying to use unshare() with the CLONE_NEWUSER flag, but this
requires that the process be single-threaded (otherwise I always get
EINVAL). /proc//task has 6 entries when I launch guile, 5
after disabling automatic finalization. I can't seem to find a way to
get that down to 1. Is this feasible
(Not sure if this is the right place to ask ¯\_(ツ)_/¯)
I'm in the position of wanting to use guile-fibers for a server (with
the usual "make a new fiber for each new client" pattern), but my
"communication with the outside world" goes beyond reading and writing
on ports - I actually have to do som
more carefully. But I suspect that the code is
> going to C land and then enters the scheme again
> via the hooks and then continuations won't work as expected.
>
> /Stefan
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:42 AM Caleb Ristvedt
> wrote:
>
>> I have a procedure that
I have a procedure that writes to an output port, a procedure that reads
from an input port, and some processing that I want to do in between. So
I figured that I'd try my hand at using continuations to write a custom
input/output port that would hook the two procedures together. The idea
is that I
