Am Mi., 3. Aug. 2022 um 11:13 Uhr schrieb Damien Mattei
:
>
> GNU Guile 3.0.1
> Copyright (C) 1995-2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'.
> This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
> under certain con
Am Do., 14. Nov. 2019 um 22:15 Uhr schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide
:
> So with your patches Lilypond works with Guile 2.0.14.
Well, the mentioned zip contains several patches from several people.
Including some of your suggestions. ;)
My own are sometimes more (rude) workarounds than fixes.
> Is t
Hi Arne,
Am Fr., 8. Nov. 2019 um 21:04 Uhr schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide
:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had the recollection that lilypond nowadays can work with Guile 2, but
> when I checked right now in the docs, I saw them saying "Version 2.x of
> Guile is not currently supported"
> http://git.savannah.gnu.or
gt; > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 22:19:50 +0200
> > From: Thomas Morley
> > To: guile-user@gnu.org
> > Subject: Problem installing the intended version
> > Message-ID:
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
Hi Mark,
Am Fr., 9. Aug. 2019 um 19:51 Uhr schrieb Mark H Weaver :
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> > recently I tested building LilyPond against guile-2.2.6 without
> > success[*] and tried to investigate whether the problem is on the
> > guile-si
Am Do., 8. Aug. 2019 um 22:19 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
>
> Hi,
>
> recently I tested building LilyPond against guile-2.2.6 without
> success[*] and tried to investigate whether the problem is on the
> guile-side or at LilyPond (there are some patches which may or may not
&
Hi,
recently I tested building LilyPond against guile-2.2.6 without
success[*] and tried to investigate whether the problem is on the
guile-side or at LilyPond (there are some patches which may or may not
cause the problem).
Though I stumbled across a problem which may be caused by guile or my
na
Hi Mark,
Am So., 16. Juni 2019 um 12:35 Uhr schrieb Mark H Weaver :
> > Did I something wrong or is it a bug?
>
> Neither. This is a case of unspecified behavior, and the behavior of
> our compiler differs from that of our interpreter. You will notice
> similar discrepancies when comparing two
Am So., 16. Juni 2019 um 11:49 Uhr schrieb Mark H Weaver :
>
> Hello again Vladimir,
>
> Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> > - Is there a way to work around this (either using the above 'let'
> > construct or anything else)?
>
> I'm not quite sure how to answer this question because I don't know what
>
Am Di., 13. Nov. 2018 um 22:50 Uhr schrieb Zelphir Kaltstahl
:
>
> Hi!
>
> I recently noticed, that the procedure ~http-request~
> (https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Web-Client.html)
> does not seem to be available when I do:
>
> ~~~
>
> (use-modules (web client))
> (http-request
Am Mo., 5. Nov. 2018 um 11:38 Uhr schrieb Ludovic Courtès :
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thomas Morley skribis:
>
> > Recently a user wrote a large scm-file and put it into lilypond using
> > '(load file.scm)'.
> > No problem with guilev1, but with guilev2 'f
Am Mo., 5. Nov. 2018 um 09:25 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
>
> Am Mo., 5. Nov. 2018 um 02:43 Uhr schrieb Mark H Weaver :
> >
> > Thomas Morley writes:
> >
> > > what's up with 'current-load-port'?
> > >
> > > Simply check
Am Mo., 5. Nov. 2018 um 02:43 Uhr schrieb Mark H Weaver :
>
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> > what's up with 'current-load-port'?
> >
> > Simply checking in a guile-prompt I get:
> > guile-1.8: #
> > guile-2.0.14: #
> > guile-2.2.4 a
Am So., 4. Nov. 2018 um 13:50 Uhr schrieb Alex Vong :
>
> Hello,
>
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > what's up with 'current-load-port'?
> >
> > Simply checking in a guile-prompt I get:
> > guile-1.8: #
> > guil
Hi,
what's up with 'current-load-port'?
Simply checking in a guile-prompt I get:
guile-1.8: #
guile-2.0.14: #
guile-2.2.4 and guile-2.9.1:
;;; : warning: possibly unbound variable `current-load-port'
ERROR: In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: current-load-port
It's in the manual, thoug
2018-08-26 12:13 GMT+02:00 HiPhish :
> Hello Schemers,
>
> I am writing an implementation of MessagePack [1] for Guile and a part of the
> spec is the presence of a "nil" data type. What would be a good value to
> express "nothing" in Guile? I cannot use '() because that would be
> indistinguishabl
2018-04-05 10:16 GMT+02:00 calcium :
>> I think you'll find it easier to reason first about an f
>> which takes as many args as your conditionals produce, so
>> you won't be struggling to splice your "bunch of values"
>> into a bigger argument list.
>
> yes, thank you tomas,
> i stopped trying to r
2017-11-13 8:48 GMT+01:00 Christian Alpen :
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a problem installing an older guile-version.
>
> I wanted to install a development-version of lilypond, which quits with
> following error:
>
> *WARNING: Please consider installing optional programs or files: guile-2.0
> < 1.9.
2017-04-11 12:28 GMT+02:00 Vijay Pratap Chaurasia :
> Hi,
> I have a tool which compares live data between two sources. I found
> that the program runs more than 3 times slower than the same with
> guile-2.0.11 . I have done profiling but there was nothing special to point
> out. All most all
2017-03-12 22:58 GMT+01:00 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Whether being slower actually gives Lilypond a bad reputation is mostly
> unclear.
For the professional engravers among our users speed _is_ a critical criterion.
Cheers,
Harm
2017-03-13 9:52 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>> 2017-03-12 18:37 GMT+01:00 Arne Babenhauserheide :
>>> In the past 6 years Guile 2.x for Lilypond changed from "it does not
>>> work at all and Lilypond might be purged from distros" to &quo
Hi,
2017-03-09 13:13 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Courtès :
> Hello,
>
> Thomas Morley skribis:
>
>> Btw, I've improved my local setup to be able to test lilypond more
>> quickly with different guile versions. Though I wasn't able to compile
>> 1.8.8, neither
Hi Arne,
I really apreciate your interest and the energy you've put on LilyPond.
Though I beg to differ in some regards.
Please excuse if my wordings are a little rough, I'm a non-native speaker..
2017-03-12 18:37 GMT+01:00 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Hi,
>
>
> With all this focus on problems, I’d
2017-03-06 21:41 GMT+01:00 Andy Wingo :
> On Sun 05 Mar 2017 15:01, Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Here some timing values
>>
>> (1)
>> lilypond-2.19.52 using guile 1.8.7
>> (I would have prefered to build lilypond with a guile-1.8.8 build from
>> the guile-
Hi Andy,
sorry for the late reply.
My regular job eats too much time
2017-02-28 9:31 GMT+01:00 Andy Wingo :
> On Tue 28 Feb 2017 00:00, Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> The main problems/TODOs are listed here (same for guile-2.0.13 and 2.1.7):
>> https://ao2.it/tmp/lilypond-guil
2017-03-05 15:01 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
> The above is already in, see
> $ git log -p 91ff9563ebe1c1cd720ad1a44890e7375fd83da8
[...}
> See:
> git log -p d15c38c0ddd4c04edcf82cda50ca30f6dc4941fa
Aargh, those are from my local _rebased_ branch.
2017-03-05 15:09 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Here some timing values
>>
>> (1)
>> lilypond-2.19.52 using guile 1.8.7
>> (I would have prefered to build lilypond with a guile-1.8.8 build from
>> the guile-repository. Though my tr
le used for testing can be found at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-11/msg00948.html
As the author says, this file was not finished, so several errors and
warnings because of suboptimal user-input happen.
Quite typical for ongoing work and good for testings.
Compiling the file
2017-03-05 0:44 GMT+01:00 Arne Babenhauserheide :
>
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Nala Ginrut writes:
>>
>>> I think we have to elaborate the question clearer.
>>>
>>> 1. How to make guile-scheme more successful?
>>> I think this is similar to ask "how to make scheme more successful".
>>> This is
2017-03-02 0:46 GMT+01:00 Alejandro Sanchez :
>
>> On 01 Mar 2017, at 18:25, Andy Wingo wrote:
>>
>> 2.2.0 should come soon (a couple weeks hopefully), but I don't know
>> about 2.0.14. In the meantime if defining an implementation for "-"
>> works for you to handle negation, that's an OK workaro
2017-02-26 18:57 GMT+01:00 Andy Wingo :
> On Fri 24 Feb 2017 18:46, Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
>
>> The main strategical question I see for that is: Does anything make it
>> harder to complete or improve the lilypond transition to Guile 2?
>>
>> Is there something which would need to be done be
2016-11-27 13:16 GMT+01:00 Chaos Eternal :
> Seems that UTF-8 encoded string has been converted to unicode before calling
> `open',
> but on filesystem the filename is utf8 string
Your analysis is surely correct, but what to do?
I expected
guile filename_名字.scm
to work out of the box.
Am I missin
Hi all,
a chinese user came up with a weird problem.
He wants to process the string retrieved by (command-line) further, in
his file-name he used some chinese characters.
I tracked it down to the attached minimal example.
With guile-2.0.13 I get:
guile filename_名字.scm
;;; Stat of /home/hermann/D
2016-05-21 22:13 GMT+02:00 :
> ---- Thomas Morley wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I cloned the guile-git-repository in my home-directory and tried to
>> compile a local branch called `my-v2-second-try` (derived from
>> `remotes/origin/stable-2.0`).
>>
>>
Hi all,
I cloned the guile-git-repository in my home-directory and tried to
compile a local branch called `my-v2-second-try` (derived from
`remotes/origin/stable-2.0`).
Following the steps listed in INSTALL I did
./configure
without problems, then
make
which returned:
~/guile (my-v2-second-try)$
35 matches
Mail list logo
