wolf writes:
>> 1. You bind 'foo' to the syntax transformer.
>>
>> 2. During the compilation of (foo y), the compiler calls the syntax
>> transformer to
>>affect the generation of code, so it will do the right thing.
>
> Interesting, I think I understand the difference. So in some ways
Hello,
first, let me thank you for thorough explanation, it helped and I (hopefully)
now have better understanding. Few more questions are below.
On 2023-02-12 20:52:16 +0100, Taylan Kammer wrote:
> On 12.02.2023 19:46, wolf wrote:
>
> > So, I have few questions I would like to ask:
> >
> > 1.
On 12-02-2023 19:46, wolf wrote:
Also, I could not help to notice that when I use R6RS records it does work
regardless of the order:
(use-modules (rnrs records syntactic))
(define (x y)
(display (q-foo y))
(newline))
(define-record-type q (fields
On 13-02-2023 09:05, Sascha Ziemann wrote:
You also can not ask Scheme about macros, because macros are not
first-class-citizens.
>
>
> This might be interesting:
>
https://matt.might.net/articles/metacircular-evaluation-and-first-class-run-time-macros/
You actually can ask (Guile)Scheme
Sascha Ziemann writes:
> Am So., 12. Feb. 2023 um 20:52 Uhr schrieb Taylan Kammer
> :
>>
>> On 12.02.2023 19:46, wolf wrote:
>>
>> > 1. When does order matter? What is going on here?
>>
>> The order matters in this case because the SRFI-9 implementation in Guile
>> defines
>> syntax (macros)
Am So., 12. Feb. 2023 um 20:52 Uhr schrieb Taylan Kammer
:
>
> On 12.02.2023 19:46, wolf wrote:
>
> > 1. When does order matter? What is going on here?
>
> The order matters in this case because the SRFI-9 implementation in Guile
> defines
> syntax (macros) rather than just variables bound to
On 12.02.2023 19:46, wolf wrote:
> So, I have few questions I would like to ask:
>
> 1. When does order matter? What is going on here?
Heya.
The order matters in this case because the SRFI-9 implementation in Guile
defines
syntax (macros) rather than just variables bound to procedures.
If
Hello,
I had encountered interesting thing yesterday, which challenged my
understanding of guile (scheme). I always assumed that order of definitions in
scheme does not matter, as long as everything if defined when it is running.
So this should (and does) work:
(define (x) (y))
(define
