> From: Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
> Just a quick note to let you know that i released MDK 1.2.7 yesterday.
> The new version uses Guile 2.0 as its extension language.
Great. MDK's maintainer on Fedora has pushed it for inclusion in
Rawhide, which should probably hit tomorrow, in time for Fedora 19
sch
On Mon, Nov 19 2012, Mike Gran wrote:
> Hi Jao-
>
>> From: Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
>> I have patches for a new version of mdk that compiles with Guile
>> 2.0... the only missing bit is time :) i'm hoping to get to release a
>> new version before the end of the year...
>
> Great. Let me know if you
> From: Mike Gran
>
> Hi-
>
> With the Fedora 18 beta starting, I thought I'd check on the
> state of Guile. To date, Fedora hasn't moved past Guile 1.8.8.
>
> The meta-bug tracking Guile 2.0.x integration is #678238
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
>
> But, it is b
On 19 November 2012 10:14, Mike Gran wrote:
>> You may want to suggest having separate guile-1.8 and guile-2.0
>> packages to keep things moving. Or, does Fedora not encourage
>> packaging schemes like that?
>
> First, I don't want to misrepresent my role. I'm only a Fedora
> user and busybody.
Hi Daniel-
> From: Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com
> You may want to suggest having separate guile-1.8 and guile-2.0
> packages to keep things moving. Or, does Fedora not encourage
> packaging schemes like that?
First, I don't want to misrepresent my role. I'm only a Fedora
user and busybody.
On 18 November 2012 23:42, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> People can correct me if I’m wrong, but I think many of these packages
> couldn’t switch transparently to Guile 2.0, and the required porting
> effort hasn’t been started or completed yet.
Mike
You may want to suggest having separate guile-1.8
Hi Jao-
> From: Jose A. Ortega Ruiz
> I have patches for a new version of mdk that compiles with Guile
> 2.0... the only missing bit is time :) i'm hoping to get to release a
> new version before the end of the year...
Great. Let me know if you need anything.
-Mike Gran
Hi Peter-
> From: Peter TB Brett
> I'll be releasing a new version of geda-gaf (1.8.0) which supports 2.0.x
> well
> within the next few hours, hopefully.
That's great news. Thank you.
-Mike Gran
On Sun, Nov 18 2012, Mike Gran wrote:
[...]
> - mdk (#704544)
I have patches for a new version of mdk that compiles with Guile
2.0... the only missing bit is time :) i'm hoping to get to release a
new version before the end of the year...
jao
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Mike Gran wrote:
>
> I intend to, but, where to begin? I'll try contacting some
> of the projects on their fora to see if I can lend a hand.
>
Thanks a lot! That would be a great thing for Guile.
> But first I thought I see if this thread here would yie
> From: Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org
>> These are
>> - Texmacs (#704515)
>> - Autogen (#704517)
>> - coot (#704518)
>> - Demeno (#704519)
>> - Freehoo (#704521)
>> - Freetalk (#704522)
>> - geda-gaf (#704524)
>> - gnucash (#704527)
>> - gnu robots (#704528) - looks complete, but bug is still open
Mike Gran writes:
> Hi-
>
> With the Fedora 18 beta starting, I thought I'd check on the
> state of Guile. To date, Fedora hasn't moved past Guile 1.8.8.
>
> The meta-bug tracking Guile 2.0.x integration is #678238
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
>
> But, it is bei
Hi Mike,
Mike Gran skribis:
> These are
> - Texmacs (#704515)
> - Autogen (#704517)
> - coot (#704518)
> - Demeno (#704519)
> - Freehoo (#704521)
> - Freetalk (#704522)
> - geda-gaf (#704524)
> - gnucash (#704527)
> - gnu robots (#704528) - looks complete, but bug is still open
> - guile-gnome-p
Hi-
With the Fedora 18 beta starting, I thought I'd check on the
state of Guile. To date, Fedora hasn't moved past Guile 1.8.8.
The meta-bug tracking Guile 2.0.x integration is #678238
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
But, it is being blocked by several packages failing t
14 matches
Mail list logo
