This version has fixed file missing during compilation.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> Rebased to the latest, folks may download the tarball directly
> https://github.com/NalaGinrut/guile-tjit/releases/tag/tjit-2.1.8.975-1f6fc-rebase
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:19 PM,
Rebased to the latest, folks may download the tarball directly
https://github.com/NalaGinrut/guile-tjit/releases/tag/tjit-2.1.8.975-1f6fc-rebase
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Nala Ginrut wrote:
> I've rebased the latest master (2.1.7.1040-0f7db-dirty) and fixed to work.
> The result become mor
I've rebased the latest master (2.1.7.1040-0f7db-dirty) and fixed to work.
The result become more interesting with the naive case mentioned in my
earlier mail:
Chez: 15s
Guile-JIT: 12s
Alright, we still need to face some problems.
In Atsuro's original design, there're two files should be included
赞(+1)
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:49 PM Nala Ginrut wrote:
> Hi folks!
> It's been a long time for me to be inactive here. ;-)
>
> I saw there's thread to discuss Guile benchmark, I think it's better
> to mention the JIT compiler of Guile. It exists and real, and of
&
Hi folks!
It's been a long time for me to be inactive here. ;-)
I saw there's thread to discuss Guile benchmark, I think it's better
to mention the JIT compiler of Guile. It exists and real, and of
course, very fast.
Thanks Atsuro Hoshino, who is the author of Guile JIT compiler
Chris Vine writes:
> No, on my Haswell laptop running 64-bit linux, solving the 40,000th
> prime (479909) is 1.26 times faster in chez scheme than in guile-2.1.7,
> on the simple algorithm. (0.509 seconds versus 0.624 seconds, on a
> i7-4712HQ CPU @ 2.30GHz.) This is only the time taken in the b
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:28:32 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Chris Vine writes:
>
> > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:00:54 +0100
> > Andy Wingo wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thu 26 Jan 2017 09:39, Rchar writes:
> >> > https://ecraven.github.io/r7rs-benchmarks/benchmark.html
> >> > Is Guile sl
Chris Vine writes:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:00:54 +0100
> Andy Wingo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu 26 Jan 2017 09:39, Rchar writes:
>> > https://ecraven.github.io/r7rs-benchmarks/benchmark.html
>> > Is Guile slow or fast, comparing to others?
>>
>> Schemes that compile to native code go faste
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:00:54 +0100
Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu 26 Jan 2017 09:39, Rchar writes:
>
> > I wanted to compare Guile scheme to other scheme implementations
> > and I found
> > this:https://ecraven.github.io/r7rs-benchmarks/benchmark.html
> >
> > Is Guile slow or fast, comparin
Hi,
On Thu 26 Jan 2017 09:39, Rchar writes:
> I wanted to compare Guile scheme to other scheme implementations and I found
> this:https://ecraven.github.io/r7rs-benchmarks/benchmark.html
>
> Is Guile slow or fast, comparing to others?
Besides what Mike said, there are two kinds of Schemes in t
Hi,
Rchar skribis:
> Is Guile scheme slows down entire GuixSD (If Guile speeds up, GuixSD also
> speeds up)?
GuixSD is a GNU/Linux distro and even if some components are written in
Guile (such as the Shepherd and some low-level helpers), most of it is
written in C.
Guile’s speed has an influe
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Mike Gran wrote:
>
> On Thursday, January 26, 2017 7:31 AM, Rchar wrote:
>
>
>> Is Guile slow or fast, comparing to others?
>
> Guile is about average compared to the others. But it depends
> on the specific task. It is usually not the fastest or slowest.
FWIW,
Hello,
I wanted to compare Guile scheme to other scheme implementations and I found
this:https://ecraven.github.io/r7rs-benchmarks/benchmark.html
Is Guile slow or fast, comparing to others?
Is Guile scheme slows down entire GuixSD (If Guile speeds up, GuixSD also
speeds up)?
Recently I found sch
13 matches
Mail list logo
