Re: Raising awareness about guile-pfds status

2019-07-16 Thread Linus Björnstam
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, at 23:19, John Cowan wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 4:50 PM Linus Björnstam > wrote: > > > If it is HAMTs or persistent vectors you want, I have a git repo of Andy's > > Fash and Fector (functional hashmaps and functional.vectors). Fash lacks > > some parts to

Re: Raising awareness about guile-pfds status

2019-07-15 Thread John Cowan
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 4:50 PM Linus Björnstam wrote: If it is HAMTs or persistent vectors you want, I have a git repo of Andy's > Fash and Fector (functional hashmaps and functional.vectors). Fash lacks > some parts to become a fast implementation of (srfi 146 hash), Is there a speed problem

Re: Raising awareness about guile-pfds status

2019-07-15 Thread Linus Björnstam
If it is HAMTs or persistent vectors you want, I have a git repo of Andy's Fash and Fector (functional hashmaps and functional.vectors). Fash lacks some parts to become a fast implementation of (srfi 146 hash), like being able to properly delete keys. I would implement it myself if I had any

Re: Raising awareness about guile-pfds status

2019-07-15 Thread Nala Ginrut
I'll rewrite a new one when I got time. Amirouche Boubekki 于 2019年7月16日周二 00:06写道: > The original maintainer of guile-pfds is sadly not responding to my mails. > > Right now, guile-pfds is the goto solution for functional data structures > in Guile, > and prolly other Scheme implementations. >

Raising awareness about guile-pfds status

2019-07-15 Thread Amirouche Boubekki
The original maintainer of guile-pfds is sadly not responding to my mails. Right now, guile-pfds is the goto solution for functional data structures in Guile, and prolly other Scheme implementations. At least the hamt has a bug, see https://github.com/ijp/pfds/pull/6/files I think this is a