Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| From: Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Specifically, 'eqv?' would be changed to return '#t' when comparing
| negative and positive zero:
|
| (eqv? 0.0 -0.0) = #t
I missed the explanation for why this might be desirable.
Primarily for
| From: Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:04:20 +0300
|
| after enormous procrastination, I am now convinced that the change
| in semantics of eqv? from 1.6 to 1.8 was wrong, and I think that we
| should revert the eqv? behavior for the next 1.8.1 release. It's a
Hi,
after enormous procrastination, I am now convinced that the change in
semantics of eqv? from 1.6 to 1.8 was wrong, and I think that we
should revert the eqv? behavior for the next 1.8.1 release. It's a
bug in the design and should be fixed.
(Credit goes to Aubrey Jaffer for pointing out the
