Hi Vladimir,
Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> Great, I've adapted your example to our code and it works
> nice. Thank you very much!
You're welcome, and I'm glad to hear it :)
Best,
Mark
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 07:29:59AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
>
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (define (function-generator)
> >(let ((func #f))
> > (lambda () (set! func (let a () a))
Hi Mark, John,
My fault, sorry. In a fresh session there is no toplevel
definition of the function defined by 'let'. Looking through
Geiser history I found "(define a $9)". Probably this was the
culprit. My apologies and thank you for your help!
--
Vladimir
(λ)επτόν EDA — https://github.com/l
Hello again,
Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define (function-generator)
>(let ((func #f))
> (lambda () (set! func (let a () a)) func)))
[...]
> - Is there a way to work around this (either using the abo
Hi Mark,
Am So., 16. Juni 2019 um 12:35 Uhr schrieb Mark H Weaver :
> > Did I something wrong or is it a bug?
>
> Neither. This is a case of unspecified behavior, and the behavior of
> our compiler differs from that of our interpreter. You will notice
> similar discrepancies when comparing two
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Morley writes:
> always interested in guile developments with regard to lilypond I
> noticed some inconsistence with my local lilypond-using-guile-2.9.2
> installation.
> I think I could break it down to pure guile (no lilypond)
>
> (1) The already stated behaviour:
> ~$ guile
Hi Vladimir,
Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 08:36:34PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
>>
>> > I have tried almost a textbook example with Guile 2.2.4:
>> >
>> > scheme@(guile-user)> (define (function-generator)
>> >(let ((fun
Am So., 16. Juni 2019 um 11:49 Uhr schrieb Mark H Weaver :
>
> Hello again Vladimir,
>
> Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> > - Is there a way to work around this (either using the above 'let'
> > construct or anything else)?
>
> I'm not quite sure how to answer this question because I don't know what
>
Hello again Vladimir,
Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> - Is there a way to work around this (either using the above 'let'
> construct or anything else)?
I'm not quite sure how to answer this question because I don't know what
your requirements are.
If you need to generate unique tags, any mutable o
Mark,
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 08:36:34PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I have tried almost a textbook example with Guile 2.2.4:
> >
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (define (function-generator)
> >(let ((func #f)
Hi John,
John Cowan writes:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 4:31 AM Vladimir Zhbanov wrote:
>
> The result is unexpected for me, I expected a new self-evaluating
>> procedure every time I run the function-generator procedure (and
>> it works differently with Guile 2.0, IIUC, cannot check just now).
>
Hi Vladimir,
Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> Greetings,
>
> I have tried almost a textbook example with Guile 2.2.4:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define (function-generator)
>(let ((func #f))
> (lambda () (set! func (let a () a))
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 4:31 AM Vladimir Zhbanov wrote:
The result is unexpected for me, I expected a new self-evaluating
> procedure every time I run the function-generator procedure (and
> it works differently with Guile 2.0, IIUC, cannot check just now).
>
I tested this on Chicken, Biwa, and
Greetings,
I have tried almost a textbook example with Guile 2.2.4:
scheme@(guile-user)> (define (function-generator)
(let ((func #f))
(lambda () (set! func (let a () a)) func)))
scheme@(guile-user)> (define x (function-g
14 matches
Mail list logo
