Hi,
El 7/07/24 a las 13:23, Linus Björnstam escribió:
I had an implementation of 158 that was available in guix. However, bitbucket
discontinued hg support and now the code is gone.
It was trivial to port of the SRFI iirc.
At that time, https://www.softwareheritage.org/ was archiving public
I had an implementation of 158 that was available in guix. However, bitbucket
discontinued hg support and now the code is gone.
It was trivial to port of the SRFI iirc.
--
Linus Björnstam
On Sat, 6 Jul 2024, at 15:55, Hans-Werner Roitzsch wrote:
> On 06.07.24 02:00, Juliana Sims wrote:
>> H
On 06.07.24 02:00, Juliana Sims wrote:
Hi,
Has there been any movement on this? It would be great to have this SRFI in
Guile proper :)
Thanks,
Juli
Hello Juli,
personally, I have not seen any news regarding that. However, I also did not
quite understand what monadic formatting is or what
Hi,
Has there been any movement on this? It would be great to have this
SRFI in Guile proper :)
Thanks,
Juli
So, I have had a look and played around with trimmed/lazy and it does nothing
fancy. It relies solely on guiles own procedures for custom printers, which
means we get guile's guarrantees for free. Recursive records are no problem,
nor are circular lists of any rank or vectors any problem.
trim
Well, in the written-shared/pretty-shared case, Alex Shinn (I just ported his
reference implementation) relies on display/write for everything except lists
and vectors, and those are, from what I can tell, exhaustively checked for
cycles.
trimmed/lazy I have to have a read through in some othe
Hi John,
John Cowan writes:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 2:47 AM Mark H Weaver wrote:
>
>
>> How do you implement 'written-shared', 'pretty-shared', and
>> 'trimmed/lazy'? In particular, how do you avoid non-termination when
>> asked to print cyclic data, when the cycle includes a non-standard da
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 2:47 AM Mark H Weaver wrote:
> How do you implement 'written-shared', 'pretty-shared', and
> 'trimmed/lazy'? In particular, how do you avoid non-termination when
> asked to print cyclic data, when the cycle includes a non-standard data
> type printed using a custom print
Hi Linus,
Linus Björnstam writes:
> I am not sure I understand what you mean, but i suspect it is already
> solved, since for simple cases show will use display/write. So unless
> you try to do advanced formatting of circular lists it will do
> whatever display or write does. The same thing goes
Hi Mark!
I am not sure I understand what you mean, but i suspect it is already solved,
since for simple cases show will use display/write. So unless you try to do
advanced formatting of circular lists it will do whatever display or write
does. The same thing goes for custom printers. In fact, a
Hi Linus,
Linus Björnstam writes:
> I just ported the reference implementation of SRFI-159/166 (166 being
> the successor of 159) from the reference implementation in chibi
> scheme. The srfi document is here:
> https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-166/srfi-166.html
>
> SRFI-166 is like (ice-9 format)
Hi!
Linus Björnstam skribis:
> When SRFI-166 stabilizes I will probably make a pull request myself and
> convert the srfi document to a texi file.
>
> I want to package it as (srfi srfi-166) whenever that happens, and maybe try
> to get it into guile (or at least become the maintainer for the
Thanks Ludo!
When SRFI-166 stabilizes I will probably make a pull request myself and convert
the srfi document to a texi file.
I want to package it as (srfi srfi-166) whenever that happens, and maybe try to
get it into guile (or at least become the maintainer for the guix package
myself).
T
Linus Björnstam writes:
> I just ported the reference implementation of SRFI-159/166 (166 being the
> successor of 159) from the reference implementation in chibi scheme. The srfi
> document is here: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-166/srfi-166.html
…
> Anyway, the repo is here: https://bitbuc
Hi Linus,
Linus Björnstam skribis:
> Anyway, the repo is here: https://bitbucket.org/bjoli/guile-srfi-159 . I
> haven't ported the tests, but playing with it in guile and chibi scheme
> produces the same result. Tests are up, but I'm travelling without computer
> the next week, so there is no
Hi there!
I just ported the reference implementation of SRFI-159/166 (166 being the
successor of 159) from the reference implementation in chibi scheme. The srfi
document is here: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-166/srfi-166.html
SRFI-166 is like (ice-9 format) on steroids, drenched in molasses.
16 matches
Mail list logo