I thought about it recently, but with the upcoming srfi-197 (among others, the
chain macro) it felt rather pointless. It does absolutely the same thing, and
to my surprise I received a "thank you" for valuable input in the srfi
document. I happened to suggest the same syntax I had settled on,
>On Thursday, August 6, 2020, 09:43:53 PM GMT+1, Linus Björnstam
> wrote:
>I have some old ones over here: https://hg.sr.ht/~bjoli/guile-threading-macros
Thanks, that looks great Linus. Is there a guix package for them?
21:45, vapnik spaknik wrote:
> > Hi,
> > does anyone know of guile modules containing argument threading
> > macros & combinators, e.g. similar to dash.el & dash-functional.el for
> > elisp?
> >
> > Joe.
> >
> >
>
>
<> and <...> used by my
macros.
Other than that, we have a srfi called chain that might be finalized soon. That
must be srfi 190-something.
--
Linus Björnstam
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, at 21:45, vapnik spaknik wrote:
> Hi,
> does anyone know of guile modules containing argument t
Hi,
does anyone know of guile modules containing argument threading macros &
combinators, e.g. similar to dash.el & dash-functional.el for elisp?
Joe.
