Re: resolving anonymous procedures in statprof

2020-03-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Christopher, Christopher Howard skribis: > Hi, Guile's statprof utility is very helpful, but a lot of my output > lines point to anonymous procedures like "anon #x1db7d38". Is there a > way to figure out which specific lambdas those are referring to? In > principle it seems like I should be

Re: resolving anonymous procedures in statprof

2020-03-01 Thread Christopher Howard
What, none of the Great Ones know the answer to this? Surely I can't be the first to have anonymous functions in statprof'd code. -- Christopher Howard p: +1 (907) 374-0257 w: https://librehacker.com social: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker gpg: ADDEAADE5D607C8D (keys.gnupg.net) On Fri,

resolving anonymous procedures in statprof

2020-02-28 Thread Christopher Howard
Hi, Guile's statprof utility is very helpful, but a lot of my output lines point to anonymous procedures like "anon #x1db7d38". Is there a way to figure out which specific lambdas those are referring to? In principle it seems like I should be able to figure that out by running the dissembler (,x)