Hey Ludo,
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 22:19, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Perhaps this suggests we should document it, maybe in the “Coding Style”
> >> section? WDYT?
>
> I was really thinking about this pattern of not always exposing raw
> record constructors or record type descriptors.
You mean ad
Hi,
zimoun skribis:
>> Perhaps this suggests we should document it, maybe in the “Coding Style”
>> section? WDYT?
I was really thinking about this pattern of not always exposing raw
record constructors or record type descriptors.
> I have read the Channel section again. Maybe there in the big
Hi Ludo,
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 16:28, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> It’s not particularly “touchy”. It’s just that there was a reason for
> it and I found it important to state it because it’s a fairly widespread
> programming pattern throughout.
I understand.
> Perhaps this suggests we should d
Hi Simon,
zimoun skribis:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 23:47, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> zimoun skribis:
[...]
>> >> I’m in favor of reverting.
>
> Sorry, I did not think that the subject was so touchy. :-)
It’s not particularly “touchy”. It’s just that there was a reason for
it and I found it
Hi,
Mathieu Othacehe skribis:
>> 2. It’s on purpose that the constructor is not exported. It’s so that
>> genuine license objects have to be defined here. (Likewise, record
>> type descriptors like are generally kept private to
>> maintain encapsulation.)
>>
>> I’m in favor o
Hey!
> 2. It’s on purpose that the constructor is not exported. It’s so that
> genuine license objects have to be defined here. (Likewise, record
> type descriptors like are generally kept private to
> maintain encapsulation.)
>
> I’m in favor of reverting.
I went to fast on
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 23:47, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> zimoun skribis:
> > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 21:57, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >
> >> guix-commits@gnu.org skribis:
> >>
> >> > commit f0779922ff260df2404c90504986aa59553154fb
> >> > Author: zimoun
> >> > AuthorDate: Thu Apr 23 16:09:00 2020 +0
Hi,
zimoun skribis:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 21:57, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> guix-commits@gnu.org skribis:
>>
>> > commit f0779922ff260df2404c90504986aa59553154fb
>> > Author: zimoun
>> > AuthorDate: Thu Apr 23 16:09:00 2020 +0200
>> >
>> > licenses: Export license record.
>> >
>> >
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 21:57, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> guix-commits@gnu.org skribis:
>
> > commit f0779922ff260df2404c90504986aa59553154fb
> > Author: zimoun
> > AuthorDate: Thu Apr 23 16:09:00 2020 +0200
> >
> > licenses: Export license record.
> >
> > * guix/licenses.scm (): Export it.
Hi!
guix-commits@gnu.org skribis:
> commit f0779922ff260df2404c90504986aa59553154fb
> Author: zimoun
> AuthorDate: Thu Apr 23 16:09:00 2020 +0200
>
> licenses: Export license record.
>
> * guix/licenses.scm (): Export it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Othacehe
> - #:export
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
mothacehe pushed a commit to branch master
in repository guix.
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new f077992 licenses: Export license record.
f077992 is described below
commit f0779922ff2
11 matches
Mail list logo
