Apparently, the #:phases parameter has no influence on the python build
system.
For instance, when adding
(arguments
`(#:phases '()))
the package still gets built with the %standard-phases.
I added a line
#:phases ,phases
to
(define builder
at line 131 of guix/build-system/python.scm.
No
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:35:01PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Jason Self" skribis:
> > There will also be a hackathon going on at the GNU Project's 30th
> > anniversary [0] in Boston if anyone's interested in meeting in person
> > there. It could probably be coordinated with an online hackat
Hello,
and thanks for your comments! I am attaching a new patch.
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:49:07PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Still it’s better to keep it, as a generic version. Then, we can have:
> (define package-with-python-2
> (cut package-with-explicit-python <> python-2))
> and
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
>> BTW, what did you think of the idea of using recutils format as the
>> output? (Either as the sole output format, or otherwise as a secondary
>> format.)
>
> I like the idea. It’s always better to use a documented format,
> especially when it comes with a mode for
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> I’ve just fixed a small bug [1]. Maybe we should agree to run
>
> make distclean && ./boostrap && ./configure && make && make check
>
> before pushing, or will it be too tedious?
For this kind of error (unbound variable), just typing ‘make’ or C-c C-k
in Geiser repo
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> Should ‘./configure’ check for makeinfo? ‘make’ will fail when makeinfo
> isn’t installed.
Per the GCS, release tarballs ship with an up-to-date .info file (if you
find that it’s not the case, please report it to bug-guix), so
‘makeinfo’ is not needed, and thus ‘con
Hi Arne,
Arne Babenhauserheide skribis:
> Here’s a patch to add Mercurial as package:
Thanks for the patch!
It looks good overall. I’m assuming that it actually builds, is usable,
and that you assert that you did a reasonable auditing setting the
‘license’ field.
A few stylistic comments.
F
On 09/07/2013 02:35 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
"Jason Self" skribis:
There will also be a hackathon going on at the GNU Project's 30th
anniversary [0] in Boston if anyone's interested in meeting in person
there. It could probably be coordinated with an online hackathon too.
Based on Libby's me
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> ‘guix build’ and ‘guix package’ when ‘guix-daemon’ runs without
> ‘--no-substitutes’. (I was able to reproduce this on a different i686
> machine.)
What exactly makes you think it’s ignored? Could you copy/paste a
faulty-looking session?
TIA,
Ludo’.
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> When I tested the previous set of binaries (see the mips64el branch), it
> was necessary to adjust ‘%url-base’ in ‘build-aux/download.scm’. It
> seems that now it’s not needed since they are already available on
> hydra.gnu.org.
Well, when you’ve confirmed that you’
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:00:27PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> BTW, I haven’t check whether this is the case already, but we need
>> something like
>> (define (package-with-explicit-python p python)
>> ;; Return a version of P built for PYTHON.
>> (package (
"Jason Self" skribis:
> There will also be a hackathon going on at the GNU Project's 30th
> anniversary [0] in Boston if anyone's interested in meeting in person
> there. It could probably be coordinated with an online hackathon too.
> Based on Libby's message [1] it might be possible to coordina
> In which command? guix build, guix package, guix-daemon?
‘guix build’ and ‘guix package’ when ‘guix-daemon’ runs without
‘--no-substitutes’. (I was able to reproduce this on a different i686
machine.)
When the daemon uses the mentioned option, ‘guix build’ and ‘guix
package’ work as expected.
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 12:20:23PM +0400, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
> make distclean && ./boostrap && ./configure && make && make check
> before pushing, or will it be too tedious?
Would "make" not be enough? Usually there is a warning message when there
is a problem.
> Also, I don’t like the ‘lic
I’ve just fixed a small bug [1]. Maybe we should agree to run
make distclean && ./boostrap && ./configure && make && make check
before pushing, or will it be too tedious?
Also, I don’t like the ‘license:’ prefix. What about something like
‘l:’? It’ll probably be even better to use ‘#:select’
15 matches
Mail list logo
