Alex Sassmannshausen alex.sassmannshau...@gmail.com skribis:
I’ll go ahead and implement that in ‘core-updates’ if there are no
objections.
Presumably this would mean retrospectively fixing all current packages?
Yes, but that’s a mechanic change: moving the list of patches from the
Cool. The diff looks great... but it lacks tests.
Yes, I wanted to finish the recutils part first.
I’ve been thinking about that, and I don’t like that we’d have to use
two record sets. It’d be necessary to post-process the output nearly
every time. Then why bother? We can already filter
Nikita Karetnikov nik...@karetnikov.org skribis:
Cool. The diff looks great... but it lacks tests.
Yes, I wanted to finish the recutils part first.
I think it’s reasonable to have a first milestone without recutils
output.
I’ve been thinking about that, and I don’t like that we’d have to
On 09/15/2013 11:38 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
I believe this wonderful patch fixes the problem:
--- glibc-2.17/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/ldd-rewrite.sed~ 2012-12-25
04:02:13.0 +0100
+++
