Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Nikita Karetnikov writes:
>
>> Someone on IRC said that they would prefer to write ‘-i foo bar baz’
>> instead of ‘-i foo -i bar -i baz’. Should we change this or allow both
>> variants? And how hard would it be?
>
> You can do this:
>
> guix package --install={foo,b
Nikita Karetnikov writes:
> Someone on IRC said that they would prefer to write ‘-i foo bar baz’
> instead of ‘-i foo -i bar -i baz’. Should we change this or allow both
> variants? And how hard would it be?
You can do this:
guix package --install={foo,bar,baz}
which the shell expands to t
On 09/22/2013 11:23 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
Someone on IRC said that they would prefer to write ‘-i foo bar baz’
instead of ‘-i foo -i bar -i baz’. Should we change this or allow both
variants? And how hard would it be?
Currently -i takes an argument, hence th
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> Someone on IRC said that they would prefer to write ‘-i foo bar baz’
> instead of ‘-i foo -i bar -i baz’. Should we change this or allow both
> variants? And how hard would it be?
Currently -i takes an argument, hence this syntax.
What would be the syntax? Rememb
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> I think we should change ‘--list-generations’ to not output the zeroth
> generation. Even though it could be present in the profile, users
> shouldn’t be concerned about it.
Agreed.
> Currently, ‘--delete-generations’ ignores the zeroth generation. Other
> options
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> Can I push this patch to ‘master’? Do you see any problems?
Looks good! Minor issues discussed below.
> I had noticed that ‘--roll-back’ doesn’t output anything with
> ‘--dry-run’, so I implemented ‘--delete-generations’ similarly. Maybe
> it would be better to p
Someone on IRC said that they would prefer to write ‘-i foo bar baz’
instead of ‘-i foo -i bar -i baz’. Should we change this or allow both
variants? And how hard would it be?
pgpb1hJYB3Til.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I think we should change ‘--list-generations’ to not output the zeroth
generation. Even though it could be present in the profile, users
shouldn’t be concerned about it.
Currently, ‘--delete-generations’ ignores the zeroth generation. Other
options seem even more confusing:
1. If you don’t have
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 09:18:50PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
>> On 09/22/2013 03:29 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> >Currently,
>> >guix package -I
>> >lists the latest installed package first, which often ends up scrolling
>> >out of the window. However, this is most of
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
>> So I would suggest to revert the order of packages, listing them from
>> the first to the most recently installed.
>
> I agree.
Me too.
I’ll push the obvious fix in a moment.
Ludo’.
Andreas Enge skribis:
> When trying to use cdparanoia, I noticed the following:
>
> $ ldd `which cdparanoia`
>
> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff1e9dd000)
> libcdda_interface.so.0 => not found
> libcdda_paranoia.so.0 => not found
> libm.so.6 =>
> /nix/store/53afsq4
>> The same applies probably to --list-generations.
> ‘--list-generations’ already does this.
Oh, I was talking about generations, so your argument is valid. I agree
with this part as well, but let’s wait for other opinions.
pgpo1ZfTAmQ7z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 09:18:50PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> On 09/22/2013 03:29 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
> >Currently,
> >guix package -I
> >lists the latest installed package first, which often ends up scrolling
> >out of the window. However, this is most of the time where "things happen"
On 09/22/2013 03:29 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
Currently,
guix package -I
lists the latest installed package first, which often ends up scrolling
out of the window. However, this is most of the time where "things happen",
new packages get installed or rolled back.
Honestly, I'd like to have t
> So I would suggest to revert the order of packages, listing them from
> the first to the most recently installed.
I agree.
> The same applies probably to --list-generations.
‘--list-generations’ already does this.
pgpwfmEUyqkO5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> The two missing libraries are part of the package itself; apparently, they
> do not get encoded into the rpath. Could this be handled somehow by the build
> system? Should it be done in the package definition? Or should I set an
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
You can adjust RPATH with patchelf. Here’s an e
Can I push this patch to ‘master’? Do you see any problems?
I had noticed that ‘--roll-back’ doesn’t output anything with
‘--dry-run’, so I implemented ‘--delete-generations’ similarly. Maybe
it would be better to print something. WDYT?
From ede983c90bd4cdece708820e1d52a2d1894a51c8 Mon Sep 17
Currently,
guix package -I
lists the latest installed package first, which often ends up scrolling
out of the window. However, this is most of the time where "things happen",
new packages get installed or rolled back.
So I would suggest to revert the order of packages, listing them from the
fir
Hello again,
It's been a while, but if still desired, here the cosmetic revisions for
the list-packages page.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> From ed5771c1d5a18c31634ef075d6fe1eee70b32d6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Sassmannshausen
>> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:55:28 +0200
>> Subject: [PAT
When trying to use cdparanoia, I noticed the following:
$ ldd `which cdparanoia`
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff1e9dd000)
libcdda_interface.so.0 => not found
libcdda_paranoia.so.0 => not found
libm.so.6 =>
/nix/store/53afsq4c7r10hn77h3iyyavy2bs02403-glibc-2.17/lib
20 matches
Mail list logo
