[PATCH] gnu: Add lynx

2014-03-05 Thread Mark H Weaver
From f357eb3e00edf494430c1d2d42541b3646643a9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:16:06 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add lynx. * gnu/packages/lynx.scm: New file. * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it. --- gnu-system.am | 1 +

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lynx

2014-03-05 Thread Andreas Enge
How about putting the package into web.scm? Andreas

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lynx

2014-03-05 Thread Andreas Enge
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:34:35AM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: It's fine with me, but what about w3m.scm, wget.scm, and gnuzilla.scm? Should these all be moved as well? I noticed wget as probably misplaced. w3m would be good in web.scm as well. gnuzilla, as a gnu project, is one that I would

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lynx

2014-03-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Andreas Enge andr...@enge.fr skribis: But all this is more an expression of taste than really argumented. So far, we have no coherent policy on which package goes into which file. Personally, I tend to regroup several packages into one file. So in the end, feel free to do as you prefer.

Re: [GSoC] Package management from Emacs

2014-03-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Xue Fuqiao x...@gnu.org skribis: Here's my (tentative) plan of this project: Thanks for sharing your thoughts! This package (guix.el) will include a facility that lets you easily install (by name or by expression), remove, upgrade, and roll back packages. Of course, guix.el can also list

Re: core-updates: coreutils: FAIL: tests/misc/nohup

2014-03-05 Thread Cyril Roelandt
On 03/04/2014 06:10 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Cyril Roelandt tipec...@gmail.com skribis: On 03/04/2014 10:35 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote: ./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line 66: /dev/tty: No such device or address + fail=1 ./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line 66: /dev/tty: No such device or address +

master: FAIL: tests/store.scm (was: master: the tests take ages)

2014-03-05 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
Yes, some of the tests involve downloading a couple of packages, and building them. This takes a while the first time you run ‘make check’, but is fast in subsequent runs (unless you removed ‘test-tmp’.) Now ‘tests/store’ fails on ece262461625e80957d904f39a6818286099d367.

Re: core-updates: FAIL: tests/builders.scm; tests/packages.scm; tests/store.scm

2014-03-05 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
Could you send test-suite.log and tests/{builders,packages,store}.log? (Note: tests/foo.log is different from foo.log!) I can reproduce only the ‘tests/store’ failure on 1faca892a35941b6eed2d6c04478f9f77ab81e15. accepted connection from pid 1942, uid 1000 ;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled,

Re: core-updates: coreutils: FAIL: tests/misc/nohup

2014-03-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Cyril Roelandt tipec...@gmail.com skribis: On 03/04/2014 06:10 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Cyril Roelandt tipec...@gmail.com skribis: On 03/04/2014 10:35 AM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote: ./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line 66: /dev/tty: No such device or address + fail=1 ./tests/misc/nohup.sh: line

Re: master: FAIL: tests/store.scm

2014-03-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Nikita Karetnikov nik...@karetnikov.org skribis: Yes, some of the tests involve downloading a couple of packages, and building them. This takes a while the first time you run ‘make check’, but is fast in subsequent runs (unless you removed ‘test-tmp’.) Now ‘tests/store’ fails on

[PATCH] gnu: gnupg: Add support for version 1.4.16

2014-03-05 Thread Mark H Weaver
From 90929b7126a6676ca30f8e968d4b6ca3e10a4d3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:21:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnupg: Add support for version 1.4.16. * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg-1): New variable. --- gnu/packages/gnupg.scm | 26

[PATCH] gnu: Add ncmpc

2014-03-05 Thread David Thompson
Hello all, This patch adds a package recipe for ncmpc, a music player daemon client. How does it look? - Dave From c60b3b94bf3ea0981ec9be453036f1c57aed4f0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Thompson dthomps...@worcester.edu Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 20:45:55 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add

Re: [GSoC] Package management from Emacs

2014-03-05 Thread Xue Fuqiao
Hi Ludovic, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: The command `guix-describe-package' (I haven't come up with a good key binding yet) can prompt for the name of a package, and display a help buffer describing the package. The buffer includes the name, version, source, dependencies, home

Re: [GSoC] Package management from Emacs

2014-03-05 Thread Grim Schjetne
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: Xue Fuqiao x...@gnu.org skribis: `r' Refresh the package list (`guix-refresh'). This recomputes the package list. Perhaps there should be something that runs ‘guix pull’ too (it’s like ‘apt-get update’)? Isn't this type of operation

Re: [GSoC] Package management from Emacs

2014-03-05 Thread Xue Fuqiao
Grim Schjetne g...@schjetne.se writes: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: Xue Fuqiao x...@gnu.org skribis: `r' Refresh the package list (`guix-refresh'). This recomputes the package list. Perhaps there should be something that runs ‘guix pull’ too (it’s like ‘apt-get

[PATCHES] Add libotr and bitlbee.

2014-03-05 Thread Mark H Weaver
These patches add bitlbee and two versions of libotr (the latest and an older version needed by bitlbee). Along the way I discovered and fixed some bugs in bitlbee and will report them upstream soon. Mark From 6ece020375232d3fab6c8c1dc16e1ae0031617ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark H