Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add "guix lint".

Andreas Enge skribis: > This looks interesting, but similarly to some comment about "guix package > --show", I am wondering about the profusion of commands. I think --show may be useful to non-developers. > Maybe we should use >guix devel --lint > instead? It would make clear that this opti

Re: System installation from a USB stick

Hello, On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 09:04:49AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I’ve uploaded a new USB installation image for x86_64 for testing: I just tried booting it, successfully, on my Dell Latitude (I think E6320). As I have no free partition, I did not attempt an installation. But guix command

Re: Minimal gettext version

On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 10:17:40AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Maybe you could install Gettext with Guix? :-) Yes, that was what I did already. > Otherwise try lowering the version requirement, that may work. But as I still think that it is good to keep guix bootstrapping from my debian sta

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add "guix lint".

This looks interesting, but similarly to some comment about "guix package --show", I am wondering about the profusion of commands. Maybe we should use guix devel --lint instead? It would make clear that this option is only of interest to developers, and pave the way for more developer related fu

Module auto-loading in standalone guix

While playing with standalone Guix, I found that I was unable to mount a FAT-formatted USB drive. The kernel generated the following error message: FAT-fs (sdb1): IO charset iso8859-1 not found Loading the nls_iso8859_1 kernel module fixes the problem. Isn't there normally some mechanism for

Re: System installation from a USB stick

Commit a69576e mounts devtmpfs in a proper way. Ludo’.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] scripts: add guix lint

Eric Bavier skribis: > Would it make sense to have 'guix lint' operate at the file/module level > instead of at the package level? You really mean at the syntactic level, no? > That would be consistent with other lint-type tools, as far as I know. > It would also, I think, help with things like

Re: [PATCH 1/2] scripts: add guix lint

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Cyril Roelandt skribis: > >> * guix/scripts/lint.scm: New file. Defines a 'lint' tool for Guix packages. >> * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it. > > This is nice! > > I think this should be modular so that, when possible, checkers can also > be invoked at macro expansion ti

Re: [PATCH 1/2] scripts: add guix lint

Two things I forgot to ask for (you’ll hate me for that ;-)): 1. Could you write tests for the checkers, as tests/lint.scm? The tests would make sure that for a ‘package’ structure that exposes the problem being checked for, the checker does emit a warning on ‘guix-warning-port’,

Re: Connecting to WPA wireless networks with standalone Guix

Hello! I’m completely ignorant here, but could it be that the system also misses /dev nodes, as was reported yesterday by Adam? Ludo’.

Re: Emacs interface for Guix

Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer (2014-07-22 10:53 +0400) wrote: >> [...] get an object by its address (?), [...] > > (pointer->scm (make-pointer address)) > > More info at (info "(guile) Foreign Variables"). > > Warning: can lead to Scheme code that segfaults! :-) > > Taylan Ludovic Courtès (2014-07

Re: [PATCH 1/2] scripts: add guix lint

Cyril Roelandt skribis: > * guix/scripts/lint.scm: New file. Defines a 'lint' tool for Guix packages. > * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it. This is nice! I think this should be modular so that, when possible, checkers can also be invoked at macro expansion time. For instance, style checkers for s

Re: Emacs interface for Guix

Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer skribis: > Alex Kost writes: > >> [...] get an object by its address (?), [...] > > (pointer->scm (make-pointer address)) I was going to suggest that, but yeah, a vhash is more reasonable. :-) Ludo’.