To simplify things, I’ve applied the first two parts of these patches,
taking into account what 宋文武 suggested and adjusting the commit
messages.
What copyright line should be put in gnome.scm for the gnome-terminal
changes? You can send an updated patch or I can take care of it, as you
want–you’v
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> patch-python-shebangs
> : Self-explanatory. As at least one file is in ISO-8859 encoding this
>whole thing is wrapped in (with-fluids ((%default-port-encoding #f))
>...)
Why doesn’t the ‘patch-shebangs’ phase do its job? Could
‘patch-shebang’ be used instead
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Nice. TABs and odd indentation probably make good additional test cases
> to have in tests/cabal.scm.
I've added these test cases as suggested.
> I think it’s a matter of separating concerns. In my mind there are
> three distinct layers
Andy Wingo writes:
> Hi,
>
> Two patches. The first wraps programs in libexec/ for
> glib-or-gtk-build-system, like those programs spawned by dbus services.
> The second upgrades vte and adds gnome-terminal. WDYT?
>
> Andy
>
> From 8ffadae7fa00cb08bcd277541d6f1b00d9d5eac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 20
Hi,
Two patches. The first wraps programs in libexec/ for
glib-or-gtk-build-system, like those programs spawned by dbus services.
The second upgrades vte and adds gnome-terminal. WDYT?
Andy
>From 8ffadae7fa00cb08bcd277541d6f1b00d9d5eac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Wingo
Date: Fri, 3 A
