Daemon update again

Commit 54c260e updates the daemon again from upstream Nix code. Few interesting changes this time; interesting changes include: • Fixed-output derivations (such as downloads) are now also run in a chroot environment. The difference with other derivations is that they do not get a separ

Re: GSoC: Porting Guix to Hurd week 3+4 report.

Hey Thomas, thank you for looking into this. On 2 June 2015 at 18:55, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Shame on me, but I've never actively used/built Guix before. I do know > about , and that there must be > a Guix manual existing -- but can you help me get st

Re: [GNUnet-developers] GSoC: Binary package distribution through GnuNet (report 1)

On 06/03/2015 05:15 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi! > > asg...@free.fr skribis: > >> This first week started with cleaning and organizing the draft >> bindings I’ve been working on previously (set up of a proper directory >> structure, a small Makefile, etc.), then most of the work has been on >

Re: Daemon update

Yes, sorry for too short a snippet: PASS: gapplication 1 /gapplication/no-dbus PASS: gapplication 2 /gapplication/no-appid PASS: gapplication 3 /gapplication/properties PASS: gapplication 4 /gapplication/app-id ERROR: gapplication - missing test plan ERROR: gapplication - exited with status 139 (t

Re: [PATCH] Add (minimal) BioPerl.

Hello, On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:53:14PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > +(name "bioperl-minimal") according to the naming standard, this should probably be called perl-bio, in analogy with "libwww-perl becomes perl-libwww". > (name "python-biopython") Actually, then this should be "py

[PATCH] Add (minimal) BioPerl.

>From e8cffdb9e7a2447657b3f700b2f0beb00ad0f98e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ricardo Wurmus Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:44:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add BioPerl. * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bioperl-minimal): New variable. --- gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 36 +++

Re: [PATCH] Add a ‘verifyStore’ RPC

Eelco Dolstra skribis: > On 03/06/15 10:27, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > The patch below adds a ‘verifyStore’ RPC with the same signature as the current LocalStore::verifyStore method. >>> >>> Thanks! I've applied this with the following change to disallow repairing by >>> unprivileged user

Re: GSoC: Binary package distribution through GnuNet (report 1)

Hi! asg...@free.fr skribis: > This first week started with cleaning and organizing the draft > bindings I’ve been working on previously (set up of a proper directory > structure, a small Makefile, etc.), then most of the work has been on > mapping GnuNet’s data structures. > > This week, I’m head

Re: [PATCH] Add a ‘verifyStore’ RPC

Hi, On 03/06/15 10:27, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >>> The patch below adds a ‘verifyStore’ RPC with the same signature as the >>> current LocalStore::verifyStore method. >> >> Thanks! I've applied this with the following change to disallow repairing by >> unprivileged users (since it's a potentially

GSoC: Binary package distribution through GnuNet (report 1)

Hello, it is high time I send you my first report, as the coding period started last week. In the process of implementing package distribution through GnuNet, I started writing Guile bindings. During the community bonding period, besides the documentary work, I’ve headed to the two first problems

Re: PATCH: LibreOffice

Hello all, attached is a new patch. The good news: Patch-shebanging the external xmlsec tarball does indeed not seem to be necessary, so I replaced the package recipe by a simple origin declaration. Does this internal variable need to be mentioned in the commit message? The bad news: autoreconf

Re: Questions and Notes regarding Offloading and Substitutes

Carlos Sosa skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> >> I must say that the fact that lsh was not mentioned was originally >> intentional, on the grounds that the implementation would “soon” switch >> to Guile-SSH instead (which is compatible with OpenSSH, not lsh.) But >> that has

[PATCH] Add Couger.

>From d4f171912387304e61f2536a2eb167c7321e7663 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ricardo Wurmus Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:47:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add randomjungle. * gnu/packages/machine-learning.scm (randomjungle): New variable. --- gnu/packages/machine-learning.scm | 50 +

Re: [PATCH] Add libsvm.

>> I tried building this, I noticed that the installed binaries (svm-train, >> svm-predict, and scm-scale) don't reference libsvm.so.2. In the build >> output, I see no header files and no libsvm.so symlink, so I don't see >> how this library could be used. > > It seems that this library is in fac

[PATCHES] gnu: Update ocaml; Add camlp5, hevea, and coq.

These patches update and improve our ocaml package, and add packages for camlp5, hevea, and coq. They also add the Open Publication License 1.0 or later. Mark >From f2b8ab36b2d3697b7a93b87bfcbcd0e91294c2e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark H Weaver Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 22:49:10 -0400 S

Re: [PATCH] Add a ‘verifyStore’ RPC

Hello! Eelco Dolstra skribis: > On 01/06/15 23:20, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> The patch below adds a ‘verifyStore’ RPC with the same signature as the >> current LocalStore::verifyStore method. > > Thanks! I've applied this with the following change to disallow repairing by > unprivileged users

Re: Daemon update

Alexander Vorobiev skribis: > At first I saw the exact same error in this list: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2014-12/msg2.html Oh. > I then pulled again, rebooted the VM just in case, reinstalled guix, and It’s not necessary to reinstall Guix, it shouldn’t make any differ

Re: Merging ‘HACKING’ in the manual?

Ricardo Wurmus skribis: >>> I don't have a strong opinion. It might be a separate “Hacking” (or >>> whatever) section in the current manual or another “maint” info manual. >>> Both solutions look good to me. I have a slight preference for the >>> first variant though. >> >> Yes, that’s also my