On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:43:38AM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
I would use a snippet for something internal to Guix, or specific to the
way we handle things, while a patch is intended to be passed upstream (or
sometimes taken from upstream already) to correct a bug in the software.
Well, I am
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gvfs): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 55 ++
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
index 0feb5b4..d44cb80 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
+++
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:08:25PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:18:20PM +0200, Federico Beffa wrote:
+(inputs
+ `((python-setuptools ,python-setuptools)
+ (python-nose ,python-nose)
+ (python-cython ,python-cython)))
Should these not be
Mathieu Lirzin (2015-07-25 21:51 +0300) wrote:
Alex Kost alez...@gmail.com writes:
* emacs/guix-guile.el (guix-guile-current-module): New function.
* emacs/guix-devel.el: New file.
(guix-devel-use-modules, guix-devel-use-current-module): New functions.
* doc/emacs.texi (Emacs
Alex Kost alez...@gmail.com writes:
Following the discussion for bug#21127
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21127, I was asking
myself if it would be possible and/or desirable to have an equivalent of
config.scm for the Emacs interface, in order to avoid having multiple
*.el.in
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 01:10:14PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
I'm actually a bit confused as to the difference between a snippet vs. a
patch stage as above - when is each appropriate? Snippets are only for
removing non-free software?
I would use a snippet for something internal to Guix, or
Andreas Enge andr...@enge.fr writes:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 01:10:14PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
I'm actually a bit confused as to the difference between a snippet vs. a
patch stage as above - when is each appropriate? Snippets are only for
removing non-free software?
I would use a
Alex Kost alez...@gmail.com writes:
Mathieu Lirzin (2015-07-25 21:51 +0300) wrote:
What do you think about integrating it in section Contributing instead?
Maybe, I don't have a preference here.
Since it's not really related to package management, I think it would be
preferable to move this
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:18:20PM +0200, Federico Beffa wrote:
+(inputs
+ `((python-setuptools ,python-setuptools)
+ (python-nose ,python-nose)
+ (python-cython ,python-cython)))
Should these not be native-inputs?
+(description A fast markdown parser in pure
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:17:39PM +0200, Federico Beffa wrote:
The function 'broken-tarball-fetch' was provided by Ludovic on IRC.
I'm not 100% sure about the license.
+(license license:bsd-3)))
If you compare the license texts, it is not bsd-3, but inspired from it;
I would use
Attached is the patch.
Vlc still compiles with the new qt. Liblxqt does not; we might need to
add qt 5.4 again as a separate package. Hydra should tell us if there is
more damage...
Andreas
From 544976bc995182440ab07f6e02dbc4deb6a3f320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Enge andr...@enge.fr
I see that only several packages uses 'gpl3' license. And I don't
really understand the cases when it should be used instead of 'gpl3+'.
I looked at aarddict and weechat. They have the same
COPYING/LICENSE files as http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt. So it
should be gpl3+, right?
Then I
宋文武 iyzs...@gmail.com writes:
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gvfs): New variable.
Looks good to me, please push!
Thanks,
Mark
Mathieu Lirzin (2015-07-26 17:00 +0300) wrote:
Alex Kost alez...@gmail.com writes:
Mathieu Lirzin (2015-07-25 21:51 +0300) wrote:
What do you think about integrating it in section Contributing instead?
Maybe, I don't have a preference here.
Since it's not really related to package
Mark H Weaver (2015-07-26 18:54 +0300) wrote:
Alex Kost alez...@gmail.com writes:
I see that only several packages uses 'gpl3' license. And I don't
really understand the cases when it should be used instead of 'gpl3+'.
I looked at aarddict and weechat. They have the same
COPYING/LICENSE
宋文武 iyzs...@gmail.com writes:
+1 for remove qtwebengine.
Agreed.
(I tried to split Qt into submodules, but it seems to require a lot of
effort which I couldn't give now :-( )
On that subject: I vaguely recall you saying that the system 'pcre'
couldn't be used by Qt before because it wasn't
Hello,
I am trying to update Qt to 5.5.0. Unfortunately, it does not compile;
there are error messages such as
../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/ui/gfx/codec/jpeg_codec.cc: In function ‘boolean
gfx::
{anonymous}::FillInputBuffer(j_decompress_ptr)’:
Eric Dvorsak (2015-07-25 22:58 +0300) wrote:
Thank you Ricardo and Alex for taking the time to review and comment my
patch. I edited it to take your advices into account. I hope I did not miss
anything this time
Please add the following line to python.scm:
;;; Copyright © 2015 Eric Dvorsak
Ok I have made all the changes you recommended. Thank you for your help.
2015-07-26 11:56 GMT+02:00 Alex Kost alez...@gmail.com:
Eric Dvorsak (2015-07-25 22:58 +0300) wrote:
Thank you Ricardo and Alex for taking the time to review and comment my
patch. I edited it to take your advices into
Andreas Enge andr...@enge.fr writes:
Attached is the patch.
Vlc still compiles with the new qt. Liblxqt does not; we might need to
add qt 5.4 again as a separate package. Hydra should tell us if there is
more damage...
Andreas
From 544976bc995182440ab07f6e02dbc4deb6a3f320 Mon Sep 17
Alex Kost alez...@gmail.com writes:
I see that only several packages uses 'gpl3' license. And I don't
really understand the cases when it should be used instead of 'gpl3+'.
I looked at aarddict and weechat. They have the same
COPYING/LICENSE files as http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Christopher Allan Webber
cweb...@dustycloud.org wrote:
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Could you send an updated patch?
TIA,
Ludo’.
Done! And thank you!
Looks good! I made some minor changes and pushed.
Thanks!
- Dave
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Christopher Allan Webber
cweb...@dustycloud.org wrote:
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Could you send an updated patch?
Yep, below!
Pushed, thanks!
- Dave
23 matches
Mail list logo
