Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add autobuild.

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 01:56:44PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Looks good to me with the exception of this part of the description: And (description "Autobuild is a package that process build logs generated where "process" should be "processes". Andreas

[PATCH 2/4] emacs: Add 'guix-devel-download-package-source'.

* emacs/guix-devel.el (guix-devel-setup-repl): Use (guix packages) module. (guix-devel-download-package-source): New command. (guix-devel-keys-map): Add key binding for it. * doc/emacs.texi (Emacs Development): Document it. --- doc/emacs.texi | 6 ++ emacs/guix-devel.el | 14

Re: [PATCHES] Add vsearch.

Andreas Enge writes: > my impression is that quite a few of the packages from scientific computing > and bioinformatics fail to build on non-x86 architectures, and maybe even on > i686. Presumably, there is not much interest in running such specialised code > on less performing

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add autobuild.

Mathieu Lirzin writes: > * gnu/packages/autotools.scm (autobuild): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/autotools.scm | 25 + > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) Looks good to me with the exception of this part of the description: > +The summary

Re: .dir-locals.el vs. guix-devel-mode

Alex Kost skribis: > Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-02 00:34 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost skribis: >> >>> Ludovic Courtès (2015-09-29 22:16 +0300) wrote: >>> Alex Kost skribis: >>> [...] > So I think .dir-locals.el is not the

[PATCH 4/4] emacs: Add 'guix-devel-lint-package'

Suggested by Ludovic Courtès . * emacs/guix-devel.el (guix-devel-setup-repl): Add a workaround for 'guix-warning-port'. (guix-devel-lint-package): New command. (guix-devel-keys-map): Add key binding for it. * doc/emacs.texi (Emacs Development): Document it. --- doc/emacs.texi

Re: .dir-locals.el vs. guix-devel-mode

Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-02 00:34 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2015-09-29 22:16 +0300) wrote: >> >>> Alex Kost skribis: >>> >> [...] So I think .dir-locals.el is not the proper place for indentation rules. IMHO they

[PATCH 1/4] emacs: Add 'guix-devel-with-definition'.

* emacs/guix-devel.el (guix-devel-with-definition): New macro. (guix-devel-build-package-definition): Use it. (guix-devel-font-lock-keywords): New variable. --- emacs/guix-devel.el | 22 +++--- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/emacs/guix-devel.el

emacs: devel: Add lint/download commands.

[PATCH 1/4] emacs: Add 'guix-devel-with-definition'. [PATCH 2/4] emacs: Add 'guix-devel-download-package-source'. [PATCH 3/4] lint: Export 'run-checkers'. [PATCH 4/4] emacs: Add 'guix-devel-lint-package' -- Alex

[PATCH 3/4] lint: Export 'run-checkers'.

* guix/scripts/lint.scm (run-checkers): Export. Make 'checkers' argument optional. --- guix/scripts/lint.scm | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/guix/scripts/lint.scm b/guix/scripts/lint.scm index 3b4ff72..b1707ad 100644 --- a/guix/scripts/lint.scm +++

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Avoiding incompatible locale data in LOCPATH

Mark H Weaver skribis: > For compatibility reasons, I think we should add "/2.22" _only_ to the > entries of GUIX_LOCPATH. IMO, it's unwise to change the meaning of > LOCPATH. Some programs, build systems, or user scripts might use > "localedef" in a directory, set LOCPATH to

No sound in games using sdl-mixer

Hello, I have tried several games that use sdl-mixer (wesnoth, pingus, gnujump, extremetuxracer) and I didn't get any sound from them. Does anyone have this issue? My audio system is OK, I can play various formats using "aplay", "mpv", etc., I just don't have sound in those games. It's just my

Re: [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Fix configure flags on armhf and take target

Hi Mark, On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 12:59:51PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > It's not your fault, but the fact that (%current-system) returns a > "system" string (e.g. "mips64el-linux") but (%current-target-system) > returns a GNU triplet (e.g. "mips64el-unknown-linux-gnu") is very > confusing. The

Re: [PATCHES] Add vsearch.

Hi Ricardo, On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 01:40:07PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > On the other hand we have many more packages that cannot currently be > built because they depend on libraries or applications that fail on > i686, mips or arm. I’m hoping to look at the icedtea and openblas > failures

Re: [PATCHES] Add vsearch.

On 02/10/15 00:05, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Vsearch fails to build on platforms other than x86_64 (see ): --8<---cut here---start->8--- In file included from