On 26/10/2015, Thompson, David wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
> wrote:
>
>> Also, for Debian 8 users and maybe others, this might help:
>>
>> sudo sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone=1
>
> Yes, user namespaces are a must-have for this to work.
This patch fixes the make flags on lua-5.2 and lua-5.1. Each version has
a different Makefile that handles the flags differently.
Notably, this enables the use of dynamic libraries with Lua.
Leo Famulari (1):
gnu: lua: Build with dynamic library support.
gnu/packages/lua.scm | 25
* gnu/packages/lua.scm (lua, lua-5.1)[arguments]: Set the make flags
properly for each version of lua.
---
gnu/packages/lua.scm | 25 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lua.scm b/gnu/packages/lua.scm
index 87f53d1..7699a91 100644
Dusting this patch off. Here's a fresh patch!
- Dave
From f5312c2445d774c9355c947d3c748d064740246e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 20:32:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] scripts: Add 'container' subcommand.
* guix/scripts/container.scm: New file.
* guix/scripts/cont
So, It's been awhile. I cleaned up the docs as per your suggestions.
Attaching the updated patch just so someone can give it another look
before I push it. My "system: container: Update to new service API."
patch must be pushed first, though.
Thanks!
- Dave
From 5dde31ef51502726a2915cc4faba81f4f
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:19 PM, David Thompson
wrote:
> Getting up to speed with the changes that were made during the service
> API rewrite.
Sorry, wrong patch file! Here's the correct one.
From 54f221aa3dda8596a4b3bc57a0e911b5c8ce37c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Mon,
Getting up to speed with the changes that were made during the service
API rewrite.
>From d3dd1b2d05f17702f7fa6095132db00e2146e702 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:09:28 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] scripts: build: Add --file option.
* guix/scripts/build.scm (sho
Aljosha Papsch skribis:
> From 9488a87c2b85d5c9b7e7715475afb14f9af0ca6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Aljosha Papsch
> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:27:05 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add yapet.
>
> * gnu/packages/password-utils.scm (yapet): New variable.
Applied.
> +(native-inputs
> +
Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
> BTW, should I be requesting commit access for smaller changes like this,
> like updating version numbers?
Sure, hereby granted! :-) See “Commit Access” for the rules.
> From 3655de659692d40a0ad9d61e7aad2967e20515bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christophe
Cyrill Schenkel skribis:
> From 55122d4c14231f3646db902bc2b88469fc9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Cyrill Schenkel
> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:38:16 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add xcompmgr
>
> * gnu/packages/xorg.scm (xcompmgr): New variable.
[...]
> +(license (license:x11-style
This is to accompany the --install-from-file option I added to 'guix
package' awhile back. Makes it easy for folks to build one-off package
files like the 'guix.scm' files I keep in my personal repos.
>From d3dd1b2d05f17702f7fa6095132db00e2146e702 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Da
Hi,
this is a text based password manager which stores password entries in
an encrypted file.
Aljosha
>From 9488a87c2b85d5c9b7e7715475afb14f9af0ca6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aljosha Papsch
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:27:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add yapet.
* gnu/packages/password-ut
Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-26 00:46 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> From 6d82f6384902e7de837a4dbfc86c524dbfd9145a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Kost
>> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:51:17 +0300
>> Subject: [PATCH] refresh: Add '--list-updaters' option.
>>
>> * guix/scripts/refresh.scm
BTW, should I be requesting commit access for smaller changes like this,
like updating version numbers?
>From 3655de659692d40a0ad9d61e7aad2967e20515bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christopher Allan Webber
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:04:56 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: guile-next: Update to 20151025
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Christopher Allan Webber
wrote:
> David, you are kicking ass on this. *Thank you* so much for working so
> hard to get this in... I know it was a challenging task, but I think
> this helps pave the way for even greater things!
Thanks for your kind words, Chris!
David, you are kicking ass on this. *Thank you* so much for working so
hard to get this in... I know it was a challenging task, but I think
this helps pave the way for even greater things!
Keep on rocking for the free world,
- Chris
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> the attached patch should fix the build of subread on non-x86_64 by
> overriding the CC and CCFLAGS variables, which by default are set to
> contain a lot of x86_64 optimisations.
Nice! Could you add a comment explaining that?
> From 71a37b56d0962f0db4009bdb6a88c22025
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> From 6aa9c0cb97350d5cccb43a78e69e2b8887347df0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus
> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:37:03 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add PePr.
>
> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (pepr): New variable.
[...]
> + (modify-phases %standard-
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
wrote:
> Also, for Debian 8 users and maybe others, this might help:
>
> sudo sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone=1
Yes, user namespaces are a must-have for this to work. I will prepare
patches that mention this in the ma
David Thompson skribis:
> Thanks to Leo for bringing up this missing feature on IRC. I've been
> meaning to implement this for awhile but lacked motivation. ;)
>
> With this patch, you can freely compose packages whose inputs should be
> in the environment with ad-hoc packages that should be add
"Thompson, David" writes:
> Hello Guix hackers,
>
> I am pleased to announce that the patch for adding Linux container
> support to 'guix environment' has just landed in master!
>
> Why is this cool, you ask? Well, it enables one to truly isolate
> development environments from the rest of the s
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> I am pleased to announce that the patch for adding Linux container
> support to 'guix environment' has just landed in master!
Thanks for all the work, this is all very exciting!
Ludo’.
On 26/10/2015, Daniel Pimentel wrote:
> It's great!
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Daniel Pimentel (d4n1 3:)
>
>
Indeed. With my limited disk space, I find point 3 most attractive. I
also like how the store immutability avoids the duplication problem.
The latest version is not yet available from guix pull
On 2015-10-26 at 12:49, quoth Alex Vong:
> I don't know there is maths.scm! Is there a general guideline on where
> to put new package definition? For example, putting elisp packages in
> emacs.scm is pretty obvious but how about other cases?
I am far from the right person to be answering this qu
Hi Paul,
I don't know there is maths.scm! Is there a general guideline on where
to put new package definition? For example, putting elisp packages in
emacs.scm is pretty obvious but how about other cases?
Cheers,
Alex
On 26/10/2015, Paul van der Walt wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> On 2015-10-25 at 07
Hello Alex,
On 2015-10-25 at 07:12, quoth Alex Vong:
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add Mlucas.
>
> ...
>
> * gnu/packages/mlucas.scm: New file.
I'm not an expert, and i'm not 100% sure on this so it's an honest
question, but does this application really deserve a new package file?
Shouldn't mlucas
It's great!
Thanks,
--
Daniel Pimentel (d4n1 3:)
Hey Ludo,
On 2015-10-25 at 22:58, quoth Ludovic Courtès:
>> * gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc-network): Remove CONFIG_SHELL patch.
>> * gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc-old-time): Remove CONFIG_SHELL patch.
>> * gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc-sdl-image): Remove CONFIG_SHELL patch.
>> * gnu/packages/hask
Hi,
On Sun 25 Oct 2015 21:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Andy Wingo skribis:
>>>
* guix/build/git.scm (git-fetch): Instead of cloning the remote repo, use
the
lower-level "init" / "fetch" / "ch
29 matches
Mail list logo
