On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Andreas Enge skribis:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:11:13AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> Here’s a new tool!
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/issues.html
>>
>> Very interesting! How about omitting all the packages wit
Andreas Enge skribis:
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 157: 16 [catch #t # ...]
> In unknown file:
>?: 15 [apply-smob/1 #]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 63: 14 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
> 432: 13 [eval # #]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2401: 12 [save-module-excursion
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:11:13AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Here’s a new tool!
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/issues.html
>
> Very interesting! How about omitting all the packages with "Nothing to
> declare!" from the web page?
Initially I left th
Federico Beffa skribis:
> The attached patch fixes the problem and I can now plot with TkAgg :-)
>
> Thanks for making Tkinter available!
> Fede
>
> From b40cf5522bcc15166ca07dfbae50167203d29e2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Federico Beffa
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:20:59 +0100
> Subject: [PA
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> and this is after:
>
> $ guix size /gnu/store/65rd6p154y13dqcbkbimnwjq39k8dnym-openssh-7.0p1
> store item total
> self
> /gnu/store/65rd6p154y13dqcbkbimnwjq39k8dnym-openssh-7.0p1 91.5
> 3.9
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Andreas Enge writes:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:53:25PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>> The second patch adds “sparsehash” to the “crypto” module. It’s
>>> probably not the best module for this package — can you suggest any
>>> other location for a hash table lib
Federico Beffa writes:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Federico Beffa skribis:
> Looking into the failed build directory, it seems that PKG_CONFIG_PATH
> is set correctly. Still, it doesn't get the correct flags.
The attached patch fixes the problem and I can now
I should add a disclaimer: take my point of view with a grain of salt. There
are other Guix contributors with a much broader perspective on the project. I'm
still a newbie!
On December 1, 2015 12:35:18 PM EST, Leo Famulari wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:12:12AM +0100, Florian Paul Schmidt w
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:41:25AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> There are two ways to approach this: we change the Guix package names to
> closely match those of the upstream packages, or we pass the complete
> package structure to ‘latest-release’. The latter approach would allow
> the CRAN upd
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:12:12AM +0100, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
> ...and encourage its use. The intended semantics is to list people
> that have contributed to the packaging effort. The motivation behind
> this proposal is that in many free software projects attribution can
> be a major sourc
* gnu/packages/version-control.scm (myrepos): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/version-control.scm | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
index b132663..548fb7f 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
[...]
> You should add a ‘(file-name ...)’ expression here, because the tarball
> does not include the name of the package:
>
>(file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
OK.
>> + #:make-flags (list (string-append "DESTDIR=" (assoc-ref %outputs
>> "
Hey folks,
Looking for some feedback on my first stab at making the nginx service
extensible. With this extension mechanism, future web applications
(such as GNU MediaGoblin) that use nginx as a front-end web server will
be able to extend nginx with the server configuration that they need in
orde
On 12/01/2015 09:12 AM, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
>
> ...and encourage its use. The intended semantics is to list people
> that have contributed to the packaging effort. The motivation
> behind
[...]
Something like:
diff --git a/guix/packages.scm b/guix/packages.scm
index 68fb091..efe1dbf 10
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I noticed a flaw in the CRAN updater. The ‘latest-release’ procedure is
> called with the result of ‘(package-name package)’. The problem here is
> that Guix package names follow much stricter naming rules than the
> upstream packages.
>
> Here are a coupl
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:53:25PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> The second patch adds “sparsehash” to the “crypto” module. It’s
>> probably not the best module for this package — can you suggest any
>> other location for a hash table library?
>
> If it is not a cryptog
Hi Guix,
I noticed a flaw in the CRAN updater. The ‘latest-release’ procedure is
called with the result of ‘(package-name package)’. The problem here is
that Guix package names follow much stricter naming rules than the
upstream packages.
Here are a couple of examples of R package names and the
Hi Kyle,
thanks for the patch!
> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (myrepos): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/version-control.scm | 30 ++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
> b/gnu/packages/version-control.scm
>
Hi Ludo',
Yes, your explanation about the quoting makes sense. Also, it looks like
you were right: the PYTHONPATH leaked from my current environment. Thank
you for your help.
Would you like me to adjust the length of the longest line as mentioned by
Ben, or is my patch good to go as-is?
Thank yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
...and encourage its use. The intended semantics is to list people
that have contributed to the packaging effort. The motivation behind
this proposal is that in many free software projects attribution can
be a major source of motivation to get peopl
20 matches
Mail list logo
