Re: [PATCH] Add thinkfan.

Hello, Leo Famulari writes: > Can you add a brief comment explaining this flag? Done. > Also, can you add a phase that installs the "rcscripts"? They will be > useful for Guix users on foreign distros. Done. > I'm not sure where to install them. Since they will probably have to be > copied o

Re: Gnome-updates

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 08:32:29PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:38:58AM +, 宋文武 wrote: > > Current poppler is 0.42.0 in gnome- updates, I think when merge back into > > master, with conflict resolved it will undo the graft. Do you mean we > > resolve it explicitl

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt.

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Roel Janssen skribis: > >> I added your magic for Guile. Here is the patch: >> >>>From 6221baadea331cff7e8ab6b9ea1b3bb7737b227f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Roel Janssen >> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 14:30:25 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt. >> >> * gnu/packa

Re: [PATCH] gnu: procps: Make procps build on non Linux systems.

Manolis Ragkousis skribis: > It seems upstream commit aa9bd38d0a6fe53aff7f78fb2d9f61e55677c7b5 fixed > the issue. I updated the patch to use that. > > Manolis > > From 49daecfda965fab7b528b4333ef864a4681ac470 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Manolis Ragkousis > Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:33:56 +0

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt.

Roel Janssen skribis: > I added your magic for Guile. Here is the patch: > >>From 6221baadea331cff7e8ab6b9ea1b3bb7737b227f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Roel Janssen > Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 14:30:25 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt. > > * gnu/packages/maths.scm (nlopt): New variable.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Red Eclipse.

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:24:46PM +0200, Albin wrote: > I just installed 'red-eclipse' from a git checkout and then the link to > the binary was named 'redeclipse_linux' and not 'red-eclipse' as I had > expected. Well, this happens; we usually do not modify binary names from upstream. For instanc

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Red Eclipse.

Den 2016-05-03 kl. 21:09, skrev Alex Kost: > Andreas Enge (2016-05-02 13:38 +0300) wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:22:33PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: + (name "redeclipse") >>> I would name the package "red-eclipse", but it probably doesn't matter. >> >> That would be in line with our

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Red Eclipse.

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:08:52PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > Only the package name is renamed here. I think it would be more > consistent to rename the variable as well. My apologies, indeed. I will push an additional patch. On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:09:40PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > Probably;

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Red Eclipse.

Andreas Enge (2016-05-02 13:38 +0300) wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:22:33PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: >> > + (name "redeclipse") >> I would name the package "red-eclipse", but it probably doesn't matter. > > That would be in line with our package naming guidelines: replace everything > th

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Red Eclipse.

> From 1a78f4bb97d2697a3e202a21c3d222b30c136ac4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Kei Yamashita > Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 12:04:38 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Rename redeclipse package to match naming specification. > > * gnu/packages/games.scm (redeclipse): Rename to... > (red-eclipse): ...this. >

Re: [PATCH 04/10] gnu: remove test-only depencies of python-pbr

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 04:20:57PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote: > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pbr): remove test-only dependencies since we > are not running the tests anyway. > --- > gnu/packages/python.scm | 11 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a

Re: [PATCH 07/10] gnu: Add python-funcsigs.

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 04:21:00PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote: > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-funcsigs, python2-funcsigs): New variables. > --- > gnu/packages/python.scm | 32 > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/

Re: [PATCH 04/10] gnu: remove test-only depencies of python-pbr

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 05:33:20PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 04:20:57PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH 04/10] gnu: remove test-only depencies of python-pbr ^^^ missing `python-pbr:` > > > * gnu/packages/

Re: [PATCH 02/10] gnu: Update python-unittest2 to 0.6.0

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 04:20:55PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote: > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-unittest2, python2-unittest2): Update to > 0.6.0. > * gnu/packages/patches/python-unittest2-skip-some-tests.patch: New file. > * gnu/local.mk: Add it here. > --- > gnu/local.mk

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Red Eclipse.

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:10:22PM -0400, Kei Yamashita wrote: > Here's a patch if anyone wants to apply it. Thanks a lot, I just pushed. Andreas

Re: Gnome-updates

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:38:58AM +, 宋文武 wrote: > Current poppler is 0.42.0 in gnome- updates, I think when merge back into > master, with conflict resolved it will undo the graft. Do you mean we > resolve it explicitly in gnome-updates? That's better, thanks! And perhaps > we could updat

Re: [PATCH 06b/10] gnu: Add function libiconv-if-needed.

Ludovic Courtès writes: And the second part Greetings, Jan >From 9c00010dede03a2b59c5c18c25749bf14e6c9c10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 18:49:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 6b/10] gnu: Add function libiconv-if-needed. * gnu/packages/base.scm (libiconv-if-neede

Re: [PATCH 06a/10] gnu: Add libiconv.

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Manolis Ragkousis skribis: > >> On 04/29/2016 06:12 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >>> + #:use-module (guix build-system trivial) >>> + #:export (glibc >>> +libiconv-if-needed)) >> >> The #:export (glibc...) part only exists in wip-hurd so we need to >> remov

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Red Eclipse.

On Mon, 2 May 2016 12:38:37 +0200 Andreas Enge wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:22:33PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > > > + (name "redeclipse") > > I would name the package "red-eclipse", but it probably doesn't > > matter. > > That would be in line with our package naming guidelines: re

Re: [PATCH] gnu: procps: Make procps build on non Linux systems.

It seems upstream commit aa9bd38d0a6fe53aff7f78fb2d9f61e55677c7b5 fixed the issue. I updated the patch to use that. Manolis From 49daecfda965fab7b528b4333ef864a4681ac470 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Manolis Ragkousis Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:33:56 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: procps: Make procp

Re: [PATCH 01/10] gnu: cross: Use CROSS_*_INCLUDE_PATH for system headers.

On Tue 03 May 2016 14:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Andy Wingo skribis: > >> And why just one CROSS_C_INCLUDE_PATH -- would it not be necessary in >> theory to have such a CROSS_ARCH_... for each ARCH that we might be >> interested in? I am not suggesting that you make the change

[PATCH] gnu: Add r-estimability.

Dear Guix, Here's another R package. Kind regards, Roel Janssen >From 97775f169bcd9b81daa19ec7c298698340d5a7b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roel Janssen Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 15:04:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add r-estimability. * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-estimability): New variable

[PATCH] gnu: Add r-coda.

Dear Guix, Here's another R package I would like to use with GNU Guix. Thanks for your time. Kind regards, Roel Janssen >From 1308ecf523c5d50bf345df9277e12e03336ce32c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roel Janssen Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 14:43:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add r-coda. * gnu/pack

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add freebayes

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 07:52:51AM +, Rob Syme wrote: >Ah. Good point Roel. Until the licencing is resolved, any discussion about >how to package freebayes is of no practical value. I'll ping Erik about >the licencing as well :) To be taken as a serious alternative to GATK, freebay

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt.

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Roel Janssen skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: > > [...] > >>> Still, according to luksan/COPYRIGHT, “[s]ubroutines PBUN, PNEW, PVAR, >>> PSEN” are “for your personal use […] [n]ot for redistribution”. >>> >>> So my understanding is that we need to remove those four

Re: [PATCH] gnu: i3status: Update to 2.10.

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:07:19PM -0700, Al McElrath wrote: > > Attached is a patch to update i3status to 2.10. Thanks, I'm looking forward to testing this!

Re: [PATCH 06/10] gnu: Add libiconv.

Manolis Ragkousis skribis: > On 04/29/2016 06:12 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >> + #:use-module (guix build-system trivial) >> + #:export (glibc >> +libiconv-if-needed)) > > The #:export (glibc...) part only exists in wip-hurd so we need to > remove this in order for your patch to a

Re: [PATCH 06/10] gnu: Add libiconv.

Hello, Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > It's a good question, it puzzles me too why GNU libc decides to bundle > or duplicate the GNU iconv functionality. POSIX C libraries provide iconv: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/iconv.html libiconv exists only for incomplete or

Re: [PATCH 01/10] gnu: cross: Use CROSS_*_INCLUDE_PATH for system headers.

Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > * gnu/packages/patches/gcc-cross-environment-variables.patch: Also use CROSS_ > variants: CROSS_C_INCLUDE_PATH, CROSS_CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, > CROSS_OBJC_INCLUDE_PATH, CROSS_OBJCPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH to be used for system > libraries, see > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html

Re: [PATCH 01/10] gnu: cross: Use CROSS_*_INCLUDE_PATH for system headers.

Andy Wingo skribis: > One final ignorant question: there really is no way to do this without > patching GCC? Unfortunately no. Currently, both a native compiler and a cross compiler honor CPATH, LIBRARY_PATH, etc., meaning that they cannot be used at all in a cross-compilation environment. I t

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt.

Roel Janssen skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: [...] >> Still, according to luksan/COPYRIGHT, “[s]ubroutines PBUN, PNEW, PVAR, >> PSEN” are “for your personal use […] [n]ot for redistribution”. >> >> So my understanding is that we need to remove those four subroutines. >> The rest in that dire

Re: ANN: guix-import-debian

Hartmut Goebel skribis: > Am 02.05.2016 um 10:24 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: >> Nice work! > Thanks. > >> Would be great to have it integrated in ‘guix import’. Did you look at >> the other importers in guix/import/*.scm? Hopefully it should be simple >> enough to do the same within this framework

Re: [PATCH 0/1] Nginx: Update to 1.10.0

Leo Famulari skribis: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:21:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Leo Famulari skribis: >> >> > There is a new stable release of Nginx: 1.10.0: >> > >> > http://nginx.org/en/download.html >> > >> > Take a look at the changes to see if there are any new features we >> >

Re: [WIP 0/8] GNOME Maps

Leo Famulari skribis: > My motivation for packaging this program is that it is supposed to > support editing of OSM, which would require an OSM account. I assume > that is at least partially why GOA is required. Indeed, makes sense. > However, this program also depends on gfbgraph, which is a w

Re: Gnome-updates

iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: [...] >>> - Skip 'test_utf8_inout' of gjs. >>> it fails with gobject-introspection-1.48.0, but use python3 to >>> call the test in Regress.typelib will pass. Report as: >>>

Re: Cross-Origin Request blocked when browing non-www of packages page and mixed content

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello! > > Roel Janssen skribis: > >> I noticed that the build status icons don't work when browing: >> https://gnu.org/software/guix/packages/ (Notice the lack of 'www.') >> >> The reason: >> CORS header 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' does not match >> 'https://www.gn

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt.

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello! > > Roel Janssen skribis: > >> I think the licensing page on the website is pretty clear: >> http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/NLopt_License_and_Copyright >> >> From the page: >>> The NLopt library is under the GNU Lesser General Public License >>> (LGPL),

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add bash-tap.

Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 07:53:39PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 02:43:42PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> > Can someone with more experience take a look and apply the patch if it's >> > okay? >> >> I had a look (without having much experience with t

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add r-limma.

Dear Ricardo, Thanks for your quick response. Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Roel Janssen writes: > >> Dear Guix, >> >> I have two R packages I would like to add. The other package 'r-edger' >> depends on this one. This is the first time I'm attempting an inline >> patch, so I hope this works out w

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add r-limma.

Roel Janssen writes: > Dear Guix, > > I have two R packages I would like to add. The other package 'r-edger' > depends on this one. This is the first time I'm attempting an inline > patch, so I hope this works out well. Thanks for the patch. It worked! >>From 565fa10f9896e1143419b2a2c6496b9

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add freebayes

Ah. Good point Roel. Until the licencing is resolved, any discussion about how to package freebayes is of no practical value. I'll ping Erik about the licencing as well :) -r P.S. Erik's latest biorxiv preprint is worth a read (A Graph Extension of the Positional Burrows-Wheeler Transform and its

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add freebayes

Hello Rob, Actually, at the time I packaged freebayes, I intended to use the recursive Git fetch, but there was a problem with it in Guix at that moment. So, the clutter in my package should do almost the same as the Git recursive fetch :). There are still some licensing problems with freebayes.

[PATCH] gnu: Add r-edger.

Dear Guix, Here is a package for 'r-edger'. I sent another e-mail with the dependency 'r-limma'. Kind regards, Roel Janssen >From 5f31983e32f381dd5e98c93f8402770196fce4f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roel Janssen Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 09:26:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add r-edger. * gnu/p

[PATCH] gnu: Add r-limma.

Dear Guix, I have two R packages I would like to add. The other package 'r-edger' depends on this one. This is the first time I'm attempting an inline patch, so I hope this works out well. Kind regards, Roel Janssen >From 565fa10f9896e1143419b2a2c6496b91a135a930 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From:

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add freebayes

Hi Ricardo I'm sorry for not checking the list beforehand! Interestingly, we ended up with very different solutions to the problem of including the freebayes dependencies. Using the recursive git fetch compiles without issue for me and *seems* to produce sensible results. Perhaps some non-guix pac